mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00010419.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "662",
    "date": "06/15/22",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 662 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 29\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nI. The 2003 Guidelines Apply to the Offense Conduct............................................... 1\nA. A Jury Must Determine the End Date of Criminal Conduct that Dictates\nWhich Guidelines Book Applies Consistent with the Ex Post Facto Clause....... 3\nB. The Trial Record Is Insufficient to Support a Finding that the Offense\nConduct Continued Past November 1, 2004............................................... 4\nC. The Goals of Sentencing Are Not Served by Applying the More Onerous\n2004 Guidelines Based Solely on Epstein's Conduct...................................... 8\nII. The Five-Point Adjustment Under USSG § 4B1.5 Does Not Apply............................... 10\nA. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Present a Continuing Danger to the Public................... 11\nB. Applying § 4B1.5 Would Lead to Absurd Results............................................ 14\nIII. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Qualify for an Aggravating Role Adjustment Under USSG\n§ 3B1.1................................................................................................................... 16\nA. Ms. Maxwell Did Not Supervise Another Criminal Participant......................... 16\nB. The Criminal Activity Was Not \"Otherwise Extensive\" ..................................... 19\nIV. The Two-Point \"Undue Influence\" Enhancement Under USSG § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B)\nDoes Not Apply.................................................................................................... 20\nV. The Correct Sentencing Range is 51-63 Months Under the 2003 Guidelines................ 22\nCONCLUSION........................................................................................................... 23\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00010419",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 662 Filed 06/15/22 Page 2 of 29",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page\nI. The 2003 Guidelines Apply to the Offense Conduct............................................... 1\nA. A Jury Must Determine the End Date of Criminal Conduct that Dictates\nWhich Guidelines Book Applies Consistent with the Ex Post Facto Clause....... 3\nB. The Trial Record Is Insufficient to Support a Finding that the Offense\nConduct Continued Past November 1, 2004............................................... 4\nC. The Goals of Sentencing Are Not Served by Applying the More Onerous\n2004 Guidelines Based Solely on Epstein's Conduct...................................... 8\nII. The Five-Point Adjustment Under USSG § 4B1.5 Does Not Apply............................... 10\nA. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Present a Continuing Danger to the Public................... 11\nB. Applying § 4B1.5 Would Lead to Absurd Results............................................ 14\nIII. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Qualify for an Aggravating Role Adjustment Under USSG\n§ 3B1.1................................................................................................................... 16\nA. Ms. Maxwell Did Not Supervise Another Criminal Participant......................... 16\nB. The Criminal Activity Was Not \"Otherwise Extensive\" ..................................... 19\nIV. The Two-Point \"Undue Influence\" Enhancement Under USSG § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B)\nDoes Not Apply.................................................................................................... 20\nV. The Correct Sentencing Range is 51-63 Months Under the 2003 Guidelines................ 22\nCONCLUSION........................................................................................................... 23",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i\nDOJ-OGR-00010419",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "06/15/22",
      "November 1, 2004"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "662",
      "DOJ-OGR-00010419"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents outlines various arguments regarding the application of sentencing guidelines."
}