DOJ-OGR-00010692.json 4.4 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "1",
  4. "document_number": "675",
  5. "date": "06/25/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 675 Filed 06/25/22 Page 1 of 21\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n-v-\nGHISLAINE MAXWELL,\nDefendant.\n\nCase No. 20-CR-330 (AJN)\n\nMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF CRIME VICTIMS SARAH RANSOME'S AND ELIZABETH STEIN'S MOTION TO BE ALLOWED TO DELIVER ORAL VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS AT MAXWELL'S SENTENCING\n\nSarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, through undersigned counsel, Robert Y. Lewis and Margaret E. Mabie of the Marsh Law Firm PLLC, hereby submits this memorandum of law in support of their motion to be allowed to deliver oral victim impact statements (\"VIS\") at the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. (Dkt. 666).\n\nINTRODUCTION\n\nAs the Court is aware, this case involves what is likely the most extensive known worldwide sex trafficking operation in recent history. At the trial of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, the Government chose to prosecute a narrow sliver of the crimes that it believed Maxwell had committed. A jury found Maxwell guilty of five sex trafficking counts - Nos. 1 and 3-6 of the government's second superseding indictment.\n\nNow, at sentencing, the Court has the power and the freedom to consider the full scope of the harm that Maxwell's crimes caused. See 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (\"no limitation shall be placed on the\n\n1\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010692",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 675 Filed 06/25/22 Page 1 of 21",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -v- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No. 20-CR-330 (AJN)",
  25. "position": "top"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF CRIME VICTIMS SARAH RANSOME'S AND ELIZABETH STEIN'S MOTION TO BE ALLOWED TO DELIVER ORAL VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENTS AT MAXWELL'S SENTENCING",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, through undersigned counsel, Robert Y. Lewis and Margaret E. Mabie of the Marsh Law Firm PLLC, hereby submits this memorandum of law in support of their motion to be allowed to deliver oral victim impact statements (\"VIS\") at the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. (Dkt. 666).",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "INTRODUCTION",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "As the Court is aware, this case involves what is likely the most extensive known worldwide sex trafficking operation in recent history. At the trial of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, the Government chose to prosecute a narrow sliver of the crimes that it believed Maxwell had committed. A jury found Maxwell guilty of five sex trafficking counts - Nos. 1 and 3-6 of the government's second superseding indictment.",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "Now, at sentencing, the Court has the power and the freedom to consider the full scope of the harm that Maxwell's crimes caused. See 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (\"no limitation shall be placed on the",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "1 DOJ-OGR-00010692",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Sarah Ransome",
  61. "Elizabeth Stein",
  62. "Robert Y. Lewis",
  63. "Margaret E. Mabie",
  64. "Ghislaine Maxwell"
  65. ],
  66. "organizations": [
  67. "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
  68. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
  69. "Marsh Law Firm PLLC"
  70. ],
  71. "locations": [
  72. "New York"
  73. ],
  74. "dates": [
  75. "06/25/22",
  76. "June 28, 2022"
  77. ],
  78. "reference_numbers": [
  79. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  80. "Document 675",
  81. "Case No. 20-CR-330 (AJN)",
  82. "Dkt. 666"
  83. ]
  84. },
  85. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
  86. }