| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "9",
- "document_number": "706",
- "date": "07/12/22",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 706 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 12\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3 When the defense did ask Kate about these statements on the stand,\nTo the extent Hamilton's testimony on this point is offered as a prior inconsistent statement of Kate's, she was not given an opportunity to deny it, as required by Rule 613(b).\n9\nDOJ-OGR-00011261",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 706 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 12",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "3 When the defense did ask Kate about these statements on the stand,",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "To the extent Hamilton's testimony on this point is offered as a prior inconsistent statement of Kate's, she was not given an opportunity to deny it, as required by Rule 613(b).",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "9",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011261",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Hamilton",
- "Kate"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "07/12/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "706",
- "DOJ-OGR-00011261"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document contains extensive redactions, making it difficult to determine the full context of the content."
- }
|