DOJ-OGR-00011261.json 1.7 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "9",
  4. "document_number": "706",
  5. "date": "07/12/22",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 706 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 12\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3 When the defense did ask Kate about these statements on the stand,\nTo the extent Hamilton's testimony on this point is offered as a prior inconsistent statement of Kate's, she was not given an opportunity to deny it, as required by Rule 613(b).\n9\nDOJ-OGR-00011261",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 706 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 12",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "3 When the defense did ask Kate about these statements on the stand,",
  20. "position": "middle"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "To the extent Hamilton's testimony on this point is offered as a prior inconsistent statement of Kate's, she was not given an opportunity to deny it, as required by Rule 613(b).",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "9",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011261",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Hamilton",
  41. "Kate"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [],
  44. "locations": [],
  45. "dates": [
  46. "07/12/22"
  47. ],
  48. "reference_numbers": [
  49. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  50. "706",
  51. "DOJ-OGR-00011261"
  52. ]
  53. },
  54. "additional_notes": "The document contains extensive redactions, making it difficult to determine the full context of the content."
  55. }