mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011293.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "711",
    "date": "07/12/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 711 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 11 sure. that she did not recall making the statement but conceded that it is reflected in the 3500 material shown by the defense. be impeached by extrinsic evidence. 479:12 - 480:8 3509-005, p. 3, second full paragraph Jane does not have a recollection, is not sure if Maxwell touched her during these encounters. Objection. Not inconsistent with the witness's testimony. The witness testified that she did not recall making the statement but conceded that it is reflected in the 3500 material shown by the defense. FRE 613(b). Denial or statement that the notes are inaccurate may be impeached by extrinsic evidence. 480:9-25 3509-008, p. 10, 1st full paragraph Jane cannot remember if Maxwell was ever present for instances of oral sex or hand jobs with Epstein and Jane. Objection. The 3500 material is consistent with the witness's testimony that she does not recall if the defendant was present for instances of oral sex with Epstein. Witness denied making the statement or said she could not remember. FRE 613(b). 499:7 - 23 507:18 - 508:8 3509-008, p. 8, 4th full paragraph Her first trip to New York was to just go and have fun. Objection. Defense counsel has not identified an inconsistency in the trial testimony. Witness denied that she made the statement about her first trip to NY; earlier testified that she was abused on almost every trip. 5 DOJ-OGR-00011293",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 711 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 11",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "sure. that she did not recall making the statement but conceded that it is reflected in the 3500 material shown by the defense. be impeached by extrinsic evidence.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "479:12 - 480:8 3509-005, p. 3, second full paragraph Jane does not have a recollection, is not sure if Maxwell touched her during these encounters. Objection. Not inconsistent with the witness's testimony. The witness testified that she did not recall making the statement but conceded that it is reflected in the 3500 material shown by the defense. FRE 613(b). Denial or statement that the notes are inaccurate may be impeached by extrinsic evidence.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "480:9-25 3509-008, p. 10, 1st full paragraph Jane cannot remember if Maxwell was ever present for instances of oral sex or hand jobs with Epstein and Jane. Objection. The 3500 material is consistent with the witness's testimony that she does not recall if the defendant was present for instances of oral sex with Epstein. Witness denied making the statement or said she could not remember. FRE 613(b).",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "499:7 - 23 507:18 - 508:8 3509-008, p. 8, 4th full paragraph Her first trip to New York was to just go and have fun. Objection. Defense counsel has not identified an inconsistency in the trial testimony. Witness denied that she made the statement about her first trip to NY; earlier testified that she was abused on almost every trip.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011293",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/12/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "711",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011293"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or trial testimony related to the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text includes references to specific pages and line numbers, as well as objections and rulings made during the trial."
}