| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "8",
- "document_number": "734",
- "date": "November 19, 2021",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 734 Filed 07/15/22 Page 8 of 16\n\nNovember 19, 2021\nPage Eight\n\nmay be made available to Maxwell, if appropriate, at the conclusion of each witness's direct testimony.\"39 Maxwell also appears to have sought subpoenas directed to \"four individuals seek[ing] similar materials,\" including EVCP materials, a request this Court denied in August 2021, again without prejudice to renewal.40\n\nOn November 15, 2021, we learned that Maxwell sought leave to serve a subpoena on Ms. Feldman for certain EVCP documents and that the Court intended to authorize the subpoena. That same day, we informed the Court that we were authorized to accept service of the subpoena and that Ms. Feldman intended to move to quash it. We received a copy of the subpoena on November 16, 2021. The subpoena requests four categories of materials from four individual victims: (i) \"EVCP Material\" (as defined in the subpoena) for the four victims; (ii) communications between the EVCP and the four victims \"and/or their Attorneys\"; (iii) copies of payments to the victims \"and/or their Attorneys\"; and (iv) any releases that the four victims executed.\n\nThe government filed its motion to quash the subpoena yesterday, which provides ample basis to quash the subpoena. Ms. Feldman sets forth the following additional reasons to quash the subpoena.\n\n39 Order at 7-8 (ECF No. 252).\n40 Opinion and Order, dated Aug. 13, 2021, at 2, 5, 10 (ECF No. 334).\n\nDOJ-OGR-00011458",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 734 Filed 07/15/22 Page 8 of 16",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "November 19, 2021\nPage Eight",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "may be made available to Maxwell, if appropriate, at the conclusion of each witness's direct testimony.\"39 Maxwell also appears to have sought subpoenas directed to \"four individuals seek[ing] similar materials,\" including EVCP materials, a request this Court denied in August 2021, again without prejudice to renewal.40\n\nOn November 15, 2021, we learned that Maxwell sought leave to serve a subpoena on Ms. Feldman for certain EVCP documents and that the Court intended to authorize the subpoena. That same day, we informed the Court that we were authorized to accept service of the subpoena and that Ms. Feldman intended to move to quash it. We received a copy of the subpoena on November 16, 2021. The subpoena requests four categories of materials from four individual victims: (i) \"EVCP Material\" (as defined in the subpoena) for the four victims; (ii) communications between the EVCP and the four victims \"and/or their Attorneys\"; (iii) copies of payments to the victims \"and/or their Attorneys\"; and (iv) any releases that the four victims executed.\n\nThe government filed its motion to quash the subpoena yesterday, which provides ample basis to quash the subpoena. Ms. Feldman sets forth the following additional reasons to quash the subpoena.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "39 Order at 7-8 (ECF No. 252).\n40 Opinion and Order, dated Aug. 13, 2021, at 2, 5, 10 (ECF No. 334).",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011458",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Maxwell",
- "Ms. Feldman"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Court",
- "EVCP"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "November 19, 2021",
- "August 2021",
- "November 15, 2021",
- "November 16, 2021",
- "Aug. 13, 2021",
- "07/15/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "734",
- "252",
- "334",
- "DOJ-OGR-00011458"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
- }
|