mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011526.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "737",
    "date": "07/22/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 7 of 101\nM6SQmax1\nmaterial to sentencing or not, I am prepared to address it.\nSo I believe the first -- what I see as your first continued objection is to paragraph 22.\nMR. EVERDELL: I'm just getting my submissions.\nYes, that's correct, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I overrule the objection. I do credit Juan Alessi's testimony that the defendant identified and targeted Virginia after seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking lot. The defendant also worked with Epstein to identify and target Jane.\nParagraph three I see three objections to this paragraph. Is that a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Paragraph three, your Honor?\nTHE COURT: 23. I apologize.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I overrule the objection. The first objection is regarding the conclusion that Ms. Maxwell was the author of the essay in the paragraph. I overrule the objection because a reasonable inference supported by the trial evidence is that the defendant authored the essay. Metadata indicated that the computer was registered to \"GMax\" and the document was saved under the user name \"Ghislaine.\"\nThe second objection is to the assertion that Epstein transferred Ms. Maxwell approximately $23 million during the conspiracy. I overrule that objection. Bank statements\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00011526",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 7 of 101",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "material to sentencing or not, I am prepared to address it.\nSo I believe the first -- what I see as your first continued objection is to paragraph 22.\nMR. EVERDELL: I'm just getting my submissions.\nYes, that's correct, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I overrule the objection. I do credit Juan Alessi's testimony that the defendant identified and targeted Virginia after seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking lot. The defendant also worked with Epstein to identify and target Jane.\nParagraph three I see three objections to this paragraph. Is that a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell?\nMR. EVERDELL: Paragraph three, your Honor?\nTHE COURT: 23. I apologize.\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: I overrule the objection. The first objection is regarding the conclusion that Ms. Maxwell was the author of the essay in the paragraph. I overrule the objection because a reasonable inference supported by the trial evidence is that the defendant authored the essay. Metadata indicated that the computer was registered to \"GMax\" and the document was saved under the user name \"Ghislaine.\"\nThe second objection is to the assertion that Epstein transferred Ms. Maxwell approximately $23 million during the conspiracy. I overrule that objection. Bank statements",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00011526",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Juan Alessi",
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Ghislaine",
      "Virginia",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Mar-a-Lago"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "737",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011526"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}