| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "88",
- "document_number": "737",
- "date": "07/22/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88 M6s2Max2\n\nTHE COURT: Thank you for your patience.\n\nAs I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.\n\nUnder the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care, or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the offense.\n\nI am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described. I have given substantial thought and attention to\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011607",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 88 of 101 88 M6s2Max2",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "THE COURT: Thank you for your patience.\n\nAs I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment.\n\nUnder the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence. I am also required to consider the other factors set forth in a provision called 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). These include the nature and circumstances of the offense, and the history and characteristics of the defendant; the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment for the offense, to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant, to provide needed educational, vocational training, medical care, or other treatment. I am to take into account the kinds of sentences available, as I have said, the guideline range, any pertinent policy statement, the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct, the need to provide restitution as appropriate under the law to any victims of the offense.\n\nI am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described. I have given substantial thought and attention to",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011607",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [],
- "organizations": [
- "Supreme Court",
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "07/22/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "737",
- "DOJ-OGR-00011607"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|