mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011614.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "95 of 101",
    "document_number": "737",
    "date": "07/22/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 95 of 101 95 M6s2Max2 unfounded and exaggerated and that Ms. Maxwell's treatment at MDC was overall as good as or better than that of the typical pretrial detainee at the MDC during the pandemic. I also reject the repeated allegations that Ms. Maxwell, who was provided extensive access to computers and legal materials, as well as to highly involved counsel, was in any way not able to prepare for trial or sentencing. I will say that I think a lack of full candor regarding treatment is consistent with a lack of candor to Pretrial Services and to the Court regarding finances, as well as the dishonesty that I have concluded occurred during the civil deposition that makes up the perjury counts. Overall, the behavior appears consistent with a pattern of deflection of blame. I will note that I was -- I would emphasize that the sentencing submission talks about these complaints and blames others but did not express remorse or acceptance of responsibility. Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Maxwell today acknowledge the courage of the victims who testified and who spoke, talked about the pain and anguish that they have expressed, to some extent acknowledged the impact on them and their suffering, and I think that is important for the victims to hear. What there wasn't expressed was acceptance of responsibility. Now let me be clear. Ms. Maxwell is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional -- was fully entitled and is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional right to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011614",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 95 of 101 95",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6s2Max2 unfounded and exaggerated and that Ms. Maxwell's treatment at MDC was overall as good as or better than that of the typical pretrial detainee at the MDC during the pandemic. I also reject the repeated allegations that Ms. Maxwell, who was provided extensive access to computers and legal materials, as well as to highly involved counsel, was in any way not able to prepare for trial or sentencing. I will say that I think a lack of full candor regarding treatment is consistent with a lack of candor to Pretrial Services and to the Court regarding finances, as well as the dishonesty that I have concluded occurred during the civil deposition that makes up the perjury counts. Overall, the behavior appears consistent with a pattern of deflection of blame. I will note that I was -- I would emphasize that the sentencing submission talks about these complaints and blames others but did not express remorse or acceptance of responsibility. Ms. Sternheim and Ms. Maxwell today acknowledge the courage of the victims who testified and who spoke, talked about the pain and anguish that they have expressed, to some extent acknowledged the impact on them and their suffering, and I think that is important for the victims to hear. What there wasn't expressed was acceptance of responsibility. Now let me be clear. Ms. Maxwell is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional -- was fully entitled and is fully entitled to exercise her constitutional right to",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011614",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Ms. Sternheim"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MDC",
      "Pretrial Services",
      "Court",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "737",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011614"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or a legal document related to a court case. The text is typed, and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document includes a header with case information and a footer with the name and contact information of the reporting agency."
}