mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011671.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "741",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 106 6 LBTVMAX1\n\nTHE COURT: What I was going to say to that request is essentially what you've done, which is that I'm happy to try with the electronic. So, of course, the concern is that where I've -- in particular, where I have -- I suppose there's two concerns. One, where I've allowed a witness to testify under pseudonym, it's possible that the material that you're using would identify the witness. And so because of the way the room is structured with counsel table screens viewable to the gallery, we have to be cautious of that.\n\nAnd your suggestion was to not put it on counsel's screens, but to put it on my screen, the witness screen, my deputy's screen. And what I was going to say to that is I'm happy to try that, so long as it's completely clear to the government what it is that the witness is looking at and what you're directing the witness to so that there's no discrepancy between what the government is aware that you're showing the witness and what you're showing the witness.\n\nSo I'm happy to try that so long as you've got paper to enable if that were to fail or if, in any event, so that the government can have precisely what you're showing the witness, and that you're fully describing on the record any aspect of the document that you're identifying for the witness.\n\nMR. EVERDELL: Totally clear, your Honor. Absolutely.\n\nAnd the government has informed us that they have copies of the 3500 material, of course, and they have copies of\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00011671",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 106 6 LBTVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: What I was going to say to that request is essentially what you've done, which is that I'm happy to try with the electronic. So, of course, the concern is that where I've -- in particular, where I have -- I suppose there's two concerns. One, where I've allowed a witness to testify under pseudonym, it's possible that the material that you're using would identify the witness. And so because of the way the room is structured with counsel table screens viewable to the gallery, we have to be cautious of that.\n\nAnd your suggestion was to not put it on counsel's screens, but to put it on my screen, the witness screen, my deputy's screen. And what I was going to say to that is I'm happy to try that, so long as it's completely clear to the government what it is that the witness is looking at and what you're directing the witness to so that there's no discrepancy between what the government is aware that you're showing the witness and what you're showing the witness.\n\nSo I'm happy to try that so long as you've got paper to enable if that were to fail or if, in any event, so that the government can have precisely what you're showing the witness, and that you're fully describing on the record any aspect of the document that you're identifying for the witness.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. EVERDELL: Totally clear, your Honor. Absolutely.\n\nAnd the government has informed us that they have copies of the 3500 material, of course, and they have copies of",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011671",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "741",
      "3500",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011671"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}