mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011677.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "12",
    "document_number": "741",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106 12 LBTVMAX1\n\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2 I just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3 strikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4 sure.\n5 THE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6 defense should start.\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8 we get to the one and one and one.\n9 THE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10 MS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11 Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13 government is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14 MS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15 THE COURT: That's fine.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17 THE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18 don't do alternating strikes.\n19 MS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20 THE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21 to do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22 defense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24 way.\n25 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00011677",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 106 12 LBTVMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011677",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\n2 I just wanted to confirm that in doing alternating\n3 strikes, we would start or the government would start. I'm not\n4 sure.\n5 THE COURT: I think since the defense has ten, the\n6 defense should start.\n7 MS. STERNHEIM: So two/one, one/two, two/one, and till\n8 we get to the one and one and one.\n9 THE COURT: That's fine with me. Ms. Comey?\n10 MS. COMEY: That's fine with the government, your\n11 Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. So the defense will do two;\n13 government is one; defense, two; government, one.\n14 MS. STERNHEIM: Usually it's one and then two.\n15 THE COURT: That's fine.\n16 MS. STERNHEIM: Alternating.\n17 THE COURT: That's fine. Or you can -- as you know, I\n18 don't do alternating strikes.\n19 MS. STERNHEIM: I know. And I appreciate that --\n20 THE COURT: I've given into the requests of both sides\n21 to do it this way. You can just alternate one, one, and the\n22 defense goes, or you could do what you proposed.\n23 MS. STERNHEIM: I think we're fine with the typical\n24 way.\n25 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. The typical way is fine.",
      "position": "main content"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "MS. COMEY"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "741",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011677"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}