mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011747.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "82",
    "document_number": "741",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 106 95 LBTCMAX4 Visoski - direct\n1 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.\n2 THE COURT: Without objection, Government Exhibit 111 is admitted. You may publish.\n3 (Government's Exhibit 111 received in evidence)\n4 MS. COMEY: Thank you. Ms. Drescher, I'd ask that we please publish this. And we can take that down. Thank you, Ms. Drescher.\n5 BY MS. COMEY:\n6 Q. Mr. Visoski, you mentioned that Ms. Maxwell worked for Mr. Epstein between approximately 1994 and 2004. Based on your observations of Ms. Maxwell, what was her role as an employee for Mr. Epstein?\n7 A. She managed the households. She was involved, to my knowledge, in decorating, hiring household staff. During that time period, Mr. Epstein was quite -- was acquiring quite a lot of residences and quite large residences. So it took a lot to undertake of managing and hiring and decorating, et cetera.\n8 Q. Focusing on the period between 1994 and 2004, how would Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Epstein, or another assistant let you know about an upcoming flight for one of Mr. Epstein's planes?\n9 A. Since you're going back so far in the '94s, I believe that was before cellphones even. So when I first got hired, we were issued pagers, and at that point, the office would page us and we would call in for the message. Then I guess later on in the '90s when cellphones came to be, we were issued cellphones or I SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00011747",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 82 of 106 95 LBTCMAX4 Visoski - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011747",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: No objection.\n2 THE COURT: Without objection, Government Exhibit 111 is admitted. You may publish.\n3 (Government's Exhibit 111 received in evidence)\n4 MS. COMEY: Thank you. Ms. Drescher, I'd ask that we please publish this. And we can take that down. Thank you, Ms. Drescher.\n5 BY MS. COMEY:\n6 Q. Mr. Visoski, you mentioned that Ms. Maxwell worked for Mr. Epstein between approximately 1994 and 2004. Based on your observations of Ms. Maxwell, what was her role as an employee for Mr. Epstein?\n7 A. She managed the households. She was involved, to my knowledge, in decorating, hiring household staff. During that time period, Mr. Epstein was quite -- was acquiring quite a lot of residences and quite large residences. So it took a lot to undertake of managing and hiring and decorating, et cetera.\n8 Q. Focusing on the period between 1994 and 2004, how would Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Epstein, or another assistant let you know about an upcoming flight for one of Mr. Epstein's planes?\n9 A. Since you're going back so far in the '94s, I believe that was before cellphones even. So when I first got hired, we were issued pagers, and at that point, the office would page us and we would call in for the message. Then I guess later on in the '90s when cellphones came to be, we were issued cellphones or I",
      "position": "main"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MS. Drescher",
      "Mr. Visoski",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "THE COURT"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1994",
      "2004"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "741",
      "111",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011747"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document is a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}