mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES004/DOJ-OGR-00011767.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "102",
    "document_number": "741",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 102 of 106 115 LBTVMAX5\n1 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.\n2 THE COURT: I'll see and Ms. Williams will see the electronic version.\n3\n4 MR. EVERDELL: And the witness will too, yes.\n5 THE COURT: And the witness. Right.\n6 And then if permitted to display what you're showing, you'll use the electronic version with a careful description of exactly what page you're showing. And to the extent you're highlighting or pointing to any passage, you'll make that clear so that the government can follow along. And obviously if it is something that you've moved into evidence, it will be published to everyone, unless there's a redaction issue around identity.\n14 MR. EVERDELL: I am going to ask to move it into evidence; but they are full names of real people, so they will have to be fully redacted. The exhibit itself is just the name of a person who is testifying either under a pseudonym or a first name. It's the full name.\n19 THE COURT: Okay. So that is a sealed item entirely. So that won't be shown to the public.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.\n22 THE COURT: And therefore, can't be on the screens.\n23 But the government will have the paper and the rest -- and I'll see and the witness will see the electronic version.\n24\n25 MR. EVERDELL: Correct. And we will even just have\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00011767",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 102 of 106 115 LBTVMAX5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.\n2 THE COURT: I'll see and Ms. Williams will see the electronic version.\n3\n4 MR. EVERDELL: And the witness will too, yes.\n5 THE COURT: And the witness. Right.\n6 And then if permitted to display what you're showing, you'll use the electronic version with a careful description of exactly what page you're showing. And to the extent you're highlighting or pointing to any passage, you'll make that clear so that the government can follow along. And obviously if it is something that you've moved into evidence, it will be published to everyone, unless there's a redaction issue around identity.\n14 MR. EVERDELL: I am going to ask to move it into evidence; but they are full names of real people, so they will have to be fully redacted. The exhibit itself is just the name of a person who is testifying either under a pseudonym or a first name. It's the full name.\n19 THE COURT: Okay. So that is a sealed item entirely. So that won't be shown to the public.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: Yes.\n22 THE COURT: And therefore, can't be on the screens.\n23 But the government will have the paper and the rest -- and I'll see and the witness will see the electronic version.\n24\n25 MR. EVERDELL: Correct. And we will even just have",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011767",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Ms. Williams"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "741",
      "DOJ-OGR-00011767"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}