mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012216.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "196",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 264 607 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect\n\n1 Q. Can you please explain for the jury what were the circumstances under which a reporter approached you?\n2 A. Well, it was a reporter who called me and said --\n3 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Hearsay, your Honor.\n4 A. Okay. Sorry.\n5 MS. MOE: I'm happy to rephrase, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n7 Q. When you had that conversation with the reporter, did you want to have that conversation?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. Why did you agree to speak to that reporter?\n10 A. Because he basically blackmailed me.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Hearsay.\n12 THE COURT: Overruled. Go ahead.\n13 A. He said that he -- that court documents with my name on it were unredacted, and that the Epstein's little black book was out, and my name was in it, and he was going to print --\n14 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Hearsay.\n15 THE COURT: We'll limit what the witness has testified to as not being offered for the truth of what was stated by someone else but the effect on the listener.\n16 And let's re-narrow the question.\n17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. May I ask a leading question to navigate through this?\n18 THE COURT: Let me hear the question.\n19 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n20 DOJ-OGR-00012216",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 264 607 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012216",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Can you please explain for the jury what were the circumstances under which a reporter approached you?\n2 A. Well, it was a reporter who called me and said --\n3 MS. MENNINGER: Objection. Hearsay, your Honor.\n4 A. Okay. Sorry.\n5 MS. MOE: I'm happy to rephrase, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n7 Q. When you had that conversation with the reporter, did you want to have that conversation?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. Why did you agree to speak to that reporter?\n10 A. Because he basically blackmailed me.\n11 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Hearsay.\n12 THE COURT: Overruled. Go ahead.\n13 A. He said that he -- that court documents with my name on it were unredacted, and that the Epstein's little black book was out, and my name was in it, and he was going to print --\n14 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, your Honor. Hearsay.\n15 THE COURT: We'll limit what the witness has testified to as not being offered for the truth of what was stated by someone else but the effect on the listener.\n16 And let's re-narrow the question.\n17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. May I ask a leading question to navigate through this?\n18 THE COURT: Let me hear the question.",
      "position": "main content"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane",
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012216"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The content is a redirect examination of a witness named Jane. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}