mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012359.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "74",
    "document_number": "747",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 228 LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct her explain, as an expert, opinions, undisclosed opinions, regarding some of those issues. And I can't tell yet from your proffer whether you're trying to do the former or the latter or -- MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm not going to ask her for any opinions, your Honor. I'm going to be using leading questions throughout all of this. So there will be no -- THE COURT: Well -- MR. PAGLIUCA: -- opportunity for her to give an opinion other than yes or no. THE COURT: Well, we'll see about that. MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. Of course. 611 allows you to control the examination 100 percent, your Honor, and I get that. But I don't intend to, I guess that's the answer to the Court's question. THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor -- THE COURT: So in terms of -- let's just start with scope, if we could. So to the extent she's testified around her opinions regarding delayed disclosure in this context, is it fair cross-examination and within the scope of that to suggest that there are other reasons for delayed disclosure? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may I just have one moment? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012359",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 228 LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "her explain, as an expert, opinions, undisclosed opinions, regarding some of those issues. And I can't tell yet from your proffer whether you're trying to do the former or the latter or -- MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm not going to ask her for any opinions, your Honor. I'm going to be using leading questions throughout all of this. So there will be no -- THE COURT: Well -- MR. PAGLIUCA: -- opportunity for her to give an opinion other than yes or no. THE COURT: Well, we'll see about that. MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand. Of course. 611 allows you to control the examination 100 percent, your Honor, and I get that. But I don't intend to, I guess that's the answer to the Court's question. THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor -- THE COURT: So in terms of -- let's just start with scope, if we could. So to the extent she's testified around her opinions regarding delayed disclosure in this context, is it fair cross-examination and within the scope of that to suggest that there are other reasons for delayed disclosure? MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, may I just have one moment?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012359",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 747",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012359"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}