DOJ-OGR-00012919.json 3.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "168",
  4. "document_number": "751",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 261 1329\nLC6Cmax5 McHugh - cross\n1 THE COURT: Sustained.\n2 Q. Well, you are familiar with what a family office is; right?\n3 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor. Asked and answered.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply trying to reorient the\n5 witness, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: I'll allow it.\n7 Q. The family office takes care of the -- typically takes care\n8 of the day-to-day transactions for that wealthy family; isn't\n9 that right?\n10 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Sustained.\n12 Q. Well, it's typically the case that if you are a very\n13 wealthy person who uses a family office like the ones you've\n14 dealt with in the past, that the wealthy person is not the one\n15 signing the day-to-day checks out of those accounts, the person\n16 who runs the family office that does that; isn't that right?\n17 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Sustained.\n19 Q. In your experience with working with family offices in the\n20 past, has it been part of your experience that people whose\n21 accounts are run through the family offices are not necessarily\n22 controlled by them personally?\n23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I object.\n24 THE COURT: I'll allow it. Overruled.\n25 A. Could you repeat the question.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012919",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 261 1329",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC6Cmax5 McHugh - cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 THE COURT: Sustained.\n2 Q. Well, you are familiar with what a family office is; right?\n3 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor. Asked and answered.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: I'm simply trying to reorient the\n5 witness, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: I'll allow it.\n7 Q. The family office takes care of the -- typically takes care\n8 of the day-to-day transactions for that wealthy family; isn't\n9 that right?\n10 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Sustained.\n12 Q. Well, it's typically the case that if you are a very\n13 wealthy person who uses a family office like the ones you've\n14 dealt with in the past, that the wealthy person is not the one\n15 signing the day-to-day checks out of those accounts, the person\n16 who runs the family office that does that; isn't that right?\n17 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Sustained.\n19 Q. In your experience with working with family offices in the\n20 past, has it been part of your experience that people whose\n21 accounts are run through the family offices are not necessarily\n22 controlled by them personally?\n23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I object.\n24 THE COURT: I'll allow it. Overruled.\n25 A. Could you repeat the question.",
  25. "position": "main content"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012919",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MS. MOE",
  41. "MR. EVERDELL"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "08/10/22"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "751",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00012919"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  57. }