mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00013023.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 264 LC7VMAX1 1432\n\n1 He volunteered that it was the Interlochen application\n2 that she was shown and was asked, as you know, questions about\n3 on the stand. So whether there were other disclosures in that\n4 conversation, they weren't written down in the notes. And I\n5 suggest that maybe it is important to learn that information\n6 before the Court makes a determination about exactly the\n7 magnitude of the violation here, your Honor.\n8 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I would direct the Court's\n9 attention to our note on this, which is marked 3510-020.\n10 THE COURT: Can I have it?\n11 While Ms. Drescher is getting that, go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n12 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 The note reflects --\n14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I have a paper copy, if\n15 you'd like.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n17 Go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n18 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n19 The note reflects in the middle of the page that Brian\n20 told the government, after Jane testified, she called Brian.\n21 Jane did not discuss her testimony. She just told Brian that\n22 he should know that the defense attorney is a expletive; and he\n23 should know that's what this will be like. Jane mentioned she\n24 was shown an Interlochen application.\n25 And on that score, your Honor, I would note that the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00013023",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 264 LC7VMAX1 1432",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 He volunteered that it was the Interlochen application\n2 that she was shown and was asked, as you know, questions about\n3 on the stand. So whether there were other disclosures in that\n4 conversation, they weren't written down in the notes. And I\n5 suggest that maybe it is important to learn that information\n6 before the Court makes a determination about exactly the\n7 magnitude of the violation here, your Honor.\n8 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I would direct the Court's\n9 attention to our note on this, which is marked 3510-020.\n10 THE COURT: Can I have it?\n11 While Ms. Drescher is getting that, go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n12 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 The note reflects --\n14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I have a paper copy, if\n15 you'd like.\n16 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you.\n17 Go ahead, Ms. Moe.\n18 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.\n19 The note reflects in the middle of the page that Brian\n20 told the government, after Jane testified, she called Brian.\n21 Jane did not discuss her testimony. She just told Brian that\n22 he should know that the defense attorney is a expletive; and he\n23 should know that's what this will be like. Jane mentioned she\n24 was shown an Interlochen application.\n25 And on that score, your Honor, I would note that the",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013023",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Drescher",
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Brian",
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "Interlochen"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "3510-020",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013023"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}