DOJ-OGR-00014005.json 3.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "146",
  4. "document_number": "761",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 146 of 246 2441 LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct\n1 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd appreciate that so that I can have all of the documents in front of me.\n2 THE COURT: Okay.\n3 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you very much.\n4 THE COURT: Just so I can marinate on it. So the basic idea is that you want this witness to testify about one or two conversations that he had with this witness, who we're calling Kate, the one or two conversations that he had with Kate in which -- and his proffered testimony is that, at one point, Kate said, regarding the subject of Jeffrey Epstein, that it, quote, fell right into my lap.\nMS. STERNHEIM: That's correct.\nTHE COURT: Let's start with that one. What is the purpose for which it is being offered?\nMS. STERNHEIM: It certainly shows motive and bias on the part of Kate. There is a monetary issue here. That is not the statement of someone who feels that they are a victim as much as they feel -- it suggests that it's an opportunity that is anything but placing her in the category of victim. It sounds more like someone who is interested in a windfall.\nTHE COURT: So broadly stated, the purpose for which it's being offered?\nMS. STERNHEIM: Is her bias and motive.\nTHE COURT: And the government's objection?\nMR. ROHRBACH: The government's objection is that this\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014005",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 146 of 246 2441 LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd appreciate that so that I can have all of the documents in front of me.\n2 THE COURT: Okay.\n3 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you very much.\n4 THE COURT: Just so I can marinate on it. So the basic idea is that you want this witness to testify about one or two conversations that he had with this witness, who we're calling Kate, the one or two conversations that he had with Kate in which -- and his proffered testimony is that, at one point, Kate said, regarding the subject of Jeffrey Epstein, that it, quote, fell right into my lap.\nMS. STERNHEIM: That's correct.\nTHE COURT: Let's start with that one. What is the purpose for which it is being offered?\nMS. STERNHEIM: It certainly shows motive and bias on the part of Kate. There is a monetary issue here. That is not the statement of someone who feels that they are a victim as much as they feel -- it suggests that it's an opportunity that is anything but placing her in the category of victim. It sounds more like someone who is interested in a windfall.\nTHE COURT: So broadly stated, the purpose for which it's being offered?\nMS. STERNHEIM: Is her bias and motive.\nTHE COURT: And the government's objection?\nMR. ROHRBACH: The government's objection is that this",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014005",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. STERNHEIM",
  36. "THE COURT",
  37. "MR. ROHRBACH",
  38. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  39. "Kate"
  40. ],
  41. "organizations": [
  42. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  43. ],
  44. "locations": [],
  45. "dates": [
  46. "08/10/22"
  47. ],
  48. "reference_numbers": [
  49. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  50. "761",
  51. "DOJ-OGR-00014005"
  52. ]
  53. },
  54. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  55. }