DOJ-OGR-00014109.json 3.5 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "3",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544 LCFCmax1 asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that -- THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have -- MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party. That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well. So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter. THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application. MS. MENNINGER: I don't. THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do. MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if -- THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544 LCFCmax1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that -- THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have -- MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party. That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well. So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter. THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application. MS. MENNINGER: I don't. THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do. MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if -- THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "MS. MENNINGER"
  31. ],
  32. "organizations": [
  33. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  34. ],
  35. "locations": [],
  36. "dates": [
  37. "08/10/22",
  38. "yesterday"
  39. ],
  40. "reference_numbers": [
  41. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  42. "763"
  43. ]
  44. },
  45. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  46. }