mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00014268.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "162",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 162 of 197 2703 LCHCmax5\n\n1 THE COURT: Look, is there a basis for the government\n2 not to admit the testimony?\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Well, I think, your Honor, it's -- one\n4 moment, your Honor.\n5 Your Honor, the government, as we discussed, provided\n6 that last week to us. So it's new information for us that we\n7 had to respond to. She was never shown these documents. And\n8 it was during the deposition. I mean, she was never shown the\n9 registry records of the property records. If you own houses\n10 and there is already evidence --\n11 THE COURT: I don't know.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: I don't know either, your Honor, but I\n13 imagine if you own several places over the years, as\n14 Ms. Maxwell has, there is evidence in the record that she was\n15 living in different places over different years, many different\n16 places. You might not recall right off the top of your head\n17 the exact years that you lived at some address unless you can\n18 refresh your recollection. And it's also possible that if\n19 you're being asked a vague question in a deposition and you had\n20 two different addresses in London, you may assume they're\n21 talking about one and not the other, and you may answer the\n22 years you lived in the other address instead of the one we're\n23 actually talking about today.\n24 THE COURT: If we get a stip on the two addresses, the\n25 two property records coming in and the depo coming in, then I\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014268",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 162 of 197 2703 LCHCmax5",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Look, is there a basis for the government not to admit the testimony?\n2 not to admit the testimony?\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Well, I think, your Honor, it's -- one\n4 moment, your Honor.\n5 Your Honor, the government, as we discussed, provided\n6 that last week to us. So it's new information for us that we\n7 had to respond to. She was never shown these documents. And\n8 it was during the deposition. I mean, she was never shown the\n9 registry records of the property records. If you own houses\n10 and there is already evidence --\n11 THE COURT: I don't know.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: I don't know either, your Honor, but I\n13 imagine if you own several places over the years, as\n14 Ms. Maxwell has, there is evidence in the record that she was\n15 living in different places over different years, many different\n16 places. You might not recall right off the top of your head\n17 the exact years that you lived at some address unless you can\n18 refresh your recollection. And it's also possible that if\n19 you're being asked a vague question in a deposition and you had\n20 two different addresses in London, you may assume they're\n21 talking about one and not the other, and you may answer the\n22 years you lived in the other address instead of the one we're\n23 actually talking about today.\n24 THE COURT: If we get a stip on the two addresses, the\n25 two property records coming in and the depo coming in, then I",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014268",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "London"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014268"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the text."
}