DOJ-OGR-00014727.json 4.1 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "11",
  4. "document_number": "775",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 16 3157 LCSCMAXT\nuntil 6:00, but if this schedule presents a substantial hardship for anyone, they'll let my deputy know.\nAs I said this morning, I conclude this is necessary because we are seeing an astronomical spike in the number of COVID-positive cases in New York City due to the highly contagious omicron variant. We are, very simply, at a vastly different place regarding the pandemic than we were only a week ago. We now face a high and daily escalating risk that jurors and/or necessary trial participants would need to quarantine, thus disrupting trial and putting at risk our ability to complete this trial. Put simply, I conclude that proceeding this way is the best chance to both give the jury as much time as they need and to avoid a mistrial as a result of the omicron variant.\nSo that is what I intend to do, and I'll tell you precisely what I intend to say. I'll hear from you.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, our only issue would be telling them to deliberate through the weekend and New Year's. I don't think it's unreasonable to have them deliberate through the remainder of the week, but given the fact that the Court told them initially that they would have those days off, I don't think we should go back on that commitment entirely. I do think that it is appropriate that they deliberate through the workweek and then have the weekend off if they so choose.\nThat's my position, your Honor.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014727",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 775 Filed 08/10/22 Page 11 of 16 3157 LCSCMAXT",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "until 6:00, but if this schedule presents a substantial hardship for anyone, they'll let my deputy know.\nAs I said this morning, I conclude this is necessary because we are seeing an astronomical spike in the number of COVID-positive cases in New York City due to the highly contagious omicron variant. We are, very simply, at a vastly different place regarding the pandemic than we were only a week ago. We now face a high and daily escalating risk that jurors and/or necessary trial participants would need to quarantine, thus disrupting trial and putting at risk our ability to complete this trial. Put simply, I conclude that proceeding this way is the best chance to both give the jury as much time as they need and to avoid a mistrial as a result of the omicron variant.\nSo that is what I intend to do, and I'll tell you precisely what I intend to say. I'll hear from you.",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, our only issue would be telling them to deliberate through the weekend and New Year's. I don't think it's unreasonable to have them deliberate through the remainder of the week, but given the fact that the Court told them initially that they would have those days off, I don't think we should go back on that commitment entirely. I do think that it is appropriate that they deliberate through the workweek and then have the weekend off if they so choose.\nThat's my position, your Honor.",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014727",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MR. PAGLIUCA"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  44. ],
  45. "locations": [
  46. "New York City"
  47. ],
  48. "dates": [
  49. "08/10/22",
  50. "New Year's"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "775",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00014727"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }