mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00014796.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "49",
    "document_number": "779",
    "date": "08/22/22",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 49 of 101\nM6SQmax1\n\n1 Because there are multiple counts, all within at least four offense levels of each other, I determine 5 units under 3D1.4(a). And under 3D1.4, 5 units increases the total offense level of the group with the highest total offense level by 5 from 27 to 32.\n\n2 Last, because the defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct, the total offense level is increased by 5 from 32 to 37. 4B1.5(b)(1).\n\n3 In conclusion, I find the correct total offense level under the 2003 Guidelines is 37.\n\n4 No party disputes the defendant's Criminal History Category of I.\n\n5 Under the 2003 Guidelines, a Criminal History Category of I and total offense level of 37, produces a guideline range of 210 to 262 months' imprisonment.\n\n6 The range for the fine, again, under the 2003 manual is $20,000 to $200,000 for each count. That's 5E1.2(c)(3).\n\n7 The range for supervised release is three years to life. 5D1.2(a)(1) and (c) and 18 U.S.C. 3583(k), although I believe there is a -- yeah, I think that's supervised release.\n\n8 I don't want to hear repeated objections, but any objections based on anything I said that is new?\n\n9 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. With respect to the unit analysis, we wanted to note that under 3D1.4, a total of 5 units adds 4 levels, not 5 levels. I think the next layer on\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014796",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 49 of 101",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "M6SQmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Because there are multiple counts, all within at least four offense levels of each other, I determine 5 units under 3D1.4(a). And under 3D1.4, 5 units increases the total offense level of the group with the highest total offense level by 5 from 27 to 32.\n\n2 Last, because the defendant engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct, the total offense level is increased by 5 from 32 to 37. 4B1.5(b)(1).\n\n3 In conclusion, I find the correct total offense level under the 2003 Guidelines is 37.\n\n4 No party disputes the defendant's Criminal History Category of I.\n\n5 Under the 2003 Guidelines, a Criminal History Category of I and total offense level of 37, produces a guideline range of 210 to 262 months' imprisonment.\n\n6 The range for the fine, again, under the 2003 manual is $20,000 to $200,000 for each count. That's 5E1.2(c)(3).\n\n7 The range for supervised release is three years to life. 5D1.2(a)(1) and (c) and 18 U.S.C. 3583(k), although I believe there is a -- yeah, I think that's supervised release.\n\n8 I don't want to hear repeated objections, but any objections based on anything I said that is new?\n\n9 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. With respect to the unit analysis, we wanted to note that under 3D1.4, a total of 5 units adds 4 levels, not 5 levels. I think the next layer on",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014796",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/22/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "779",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014796"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is mostly printed, with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}