mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00015142.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "809",
    "date": "08/11/25",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 10 of 31\nre Craig; to disclose whether it had given notice of its motion to Maxwell's victims; and to file under seal the grand jury transcripts (unredacted and as redacted for proposed public release) and other grand jury materials, including exhibits. Id. at 3. The order authorized Maxwell and her victims to file, by August 5, 2025, letters addressing the Government's motion.9\nOn July 29, 2025, the Government10 submitted a memorandum responding to the July 22, 2025 order. It represented that it had now given notice of its filing to all but one victim, and sought leave to file a supplemental submission responding to the victims' submissions. Dkt. 796 (\"Gov't Mem.\"). The Government also filed, under seal, the grand jury materials the Court had requested.\nOn July 31, 2025, the Court directed the Government to file a letter (1) stating whether, as its July 29 memorandum suggested, it was moving to unseal the grand jury exhibits along with the transcripts; and (2) identifying the portions of the grand jury transcripts and exhibits that, as proposed for public release, are not already matters of public record. Dkt. 797.\nOn August 4, 2025, the Government submitted a letter seeking leave to advise the Court by August 8, 2025, of its position with respect to unsealing the grand jury exhibits. Dkt. 800. It also filed, under seal, a document indicating the portions of the grand jury transcripts that are not matters of public record.\nOn August 5, 2025, Maxwell filed a letter opposing unsealing the grand jury transcripts. Dkt. 803. That day and the next, the Court docketed a total of six letters that representatives of\n9 In a later order, the Court provided victims with logistical instructions for the submission (and redaction) of their letters. Dkt. 801.\n10 The July 29, 2025 filing (and all ensuing Government filings) were filed by both the DAG and the United States Attorney for this District.\n10\nDOJ-OGR-00015142",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 10 of 31",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "re Craig; to disclose whether it had given notice of its motion to Maxwell's victims; and to file under seal the grand jury transcripts (unredacted and as redacted for proposed public release) and other grand jury materials, including exhibits. Id. at 3. The order authorized Maxwell and her victims to file, by August 5, 2025, letters addressing the Government's motion.9\nOn July 29, 2025, the Government10 submitted a memorandum responding to the July 22, 2025 order. It represented that it had now given notice of its filing to all but one victim, and sought leave to file a supplemental submission responding to the victims' submissions. Dkt. 796 (\"Gov't Mem.\"). The Government also filed, under seal, the grand jury materials the Court had requested.\nOn July 31, 2025, the Court directed the Government to file a letter (1) stating whether, as its July 29 memorandum suggested, it was moving to unseal the grand jury exhibits along with the transcripts; and (2) identifying the portions of the grand jury transcripts and exhibits that, as proposed for public release, are not already matters of public record. Dkt. 797.\nOn August 4, 2025, the Government submitted a letter seeking leave to advise the Court by August 8, 2025, of its position with respect to unsealing the grand jury exhibits. Dkt. 800. It also filed, under seal, a document indicating the portions of the grand jury transcripts that are not matters of public record.\nOn August 5, 2025, Maxwell filed a letter opposing unsealing the grand jury transcripts. Dkt. 803. That day and the next, the Court docketed a total of six letters that representatives of",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "9 In a later order, the Court provided victims with logistical instructions for the submission (and redaction) of their letters. Dkt. 801.\n10 The July 29, 2025 filing (and all ensuing Government filings) were filed by both the DAG and the United States Attorney for this District.",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "10",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00015142",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Craig",
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "United States Attorney",
      "DAG"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "this District"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 22, 2025",
      "July 29, 2025",
      "July 31, 2025",
      "August 4, 2025",
      "August 5, 2025",
      "August 8, 2025",
      "August 11, 2025"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "809",
      "796",
      "797",
      "800",
      "801",
      "803",
      "DOJ-OGR-00015142"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell, with various dates and docket numbers referenced throughout. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
}