DOJ-OGR-00016281.json 3.6 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "65",
  4. "document_number": "759",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 65 of 267 2093 LCAVMAX2 A. Farmer - direct 1 (At sidebar) 2 THE COURT: Is this not a prior consistent statement 3 that was litigated or discussed? 4 MS. POMERANTZ: This is a prior consistent statement, 5 your Honor. 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I don't believe that we 7 have impeached her yet or called her story into question in 8 opening about this issue. So I'm a little -- I understand that 9 eventually it may be, if I do impeach her. 10 THE COURT: The opening questioned the veracity of all 11 of the accusers. 12 MS. MENNINGER: Not on every point, your Honor. I 13 mean -- 14 THE COURT: Okay. 15 MS. MENNINGER: Not that she was there, for example, 16 or anything like that. So I don't believe that it's been 17 opened, and I think it's just bolstering. 18 THE COURT: Well, is the statement just that she's 19 going to be there or what's -- what is the anticipated 20 statement? 21 MS. MENNINGER: Actually, my reading of the discovery 22 is that she told her mom, I wasn't raped. And so if that's 23 what is planned to be elicited, that's going to be a problem 24 for a lot of other reasons that have been litigated. 25 THE COURT: Is that what she's going to say? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016281",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 65 of 267 2093 LCAVMAX2 A. Farmer - direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 (At sidebar) 2 THE COURT: Is this not a prior consistent statement 3 that was litigated or discussed? 4 MS. POMERANTZ: This is a prior consistent statement, 5 your Honor. 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I don't believe that we 7 have impeached her yet or called her story into question in 8 opening about this issue. So I'm a little -- I understand that 9 eventually it may be, if I do impeach her. 10 THE COURT: The opening questioned the veracity of all 11 of the accusers. 12 MS. MENNINGER: Not on every point, your Honor. I 13 mean -- 14 THE COURT: Okay. 15 MS. MENNINGER: Not that she was there, for example, 16 or anything like that. So I don't believe that it's been 17 opened, and I think it's just bolstering. 18 THE COURT: Well, is the statement just that she's 19 going to be there or what's -- what is the anticipated 20 statement? 21 MS. MENNINGER: Actually, my reading of the discovery 22 is that she told her mom, I wasn't raped. And so if that's 23 what is planned to be elicited, that's going to be a problem 24 for a lot of other reasons that have been litigated. 25 THE COURT: Is that what she's going to say?",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016281",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MS. POMERANTZ",
  36. "MS. MENNINGER",
  37. "A. Farmer"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  48. "759",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00016281"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }