DOJ-OGR-00016454.json 3.8 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "238",
  4. "document_number": "759",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 267 2266 LCAVMAX8\n\n1 THE COURT: Go ahead, Mr. Everdell.\n2 Do you want to come to the podium?\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, please.\n4 Your Honor, the defense moves at this time for a\n5 judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on the grounds that the\n6 evidence elicited by the government in its case-in-chief is\n7 insufficient to establish each element of the offenses charged\n8 in the S2 indictment beyond a reasonable doubt.\n9 THE COURT: Move as to all counts?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Move as to all counts, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do make this application\n13 with respect to every count in the S2 indictment; but for\n14 purposes of today, I'm going to confine my comments to address\n15 specifically Counts One and Two.\n16 THE COURT: Okay.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: Which are the enticement counts,\n18 conspiracy, and the substantive enticement counts.\n19 Your Honor, as the Court is aware, those counts depend\n20 on the testimony of Jane.\n21 To convict Ms. Maxwell, the government must show that\n22 Ms. Maxwell persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to\n23 engage in sex acts that would violate New York law and the\n24 specific law that's cited in the indictment. There is no\n25 evidence in the record that Ms. Maxwell or anyone else who\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00016454",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 238 of 267 2266 LCAVMAX8",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 THE COURT: Go ahead, Mr. Everdell.\n2 Do you want to come to the podium?\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, please.\n4 Your Honor, the defense moves at this time for a\n5 judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on the grounds that the\n6 evidence elicited by the government in its case-in-chief is\n7 insufficient to establish each element of the offenses charged\n8 in the S2 indictment beyond a reasonable doubt.\n9 THE COURT: Move as to all counts?\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Move as to all counts, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we do make this application\n13 with respect to every count in the S2 indictment; but for\n14 purposes of today, I'm going to confine my comments to address\n15 specifically Counts One and Two.\n16 THE COURT: Okay.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: Which are the enticement counts,\n18 conspiracy, and the substantive enticement counts.\n19 Your Honor, as the Court is aware, those counts depend\n20 on the testimony of Jane.\n21 To convict Ms. Maxwell, the government must show that\n22 Ms. Maxwell persuaded or enticed Jane to travel to New York to\n23 engage in sex acts that would violate New York law and the\n24 specific law that's cited in the indictment. There is no\n25 evidence in the record that Ms. Maxwell or anyone else who",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016454",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Mr. Everdell",
  36. "Jane",
  37. "Ms. Maxwell"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [
  43. "New York"
  44. ],
  45. "dates": [
  46. "08/10/22"
  47. ],
  48. "reference_numbers": [
  49. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  50. "759",
  51. "DOJ-OGR-00016454"
  52. ]
  53. },
  54. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  55. }