mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016672.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "189",
    "document_number": "761",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 189 of 246\nLCGVMAX5 Loftus - redirect 2484\n1 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n2 A. Yes, I do.\n3 THE COURT: I'm going to sustain.\n4 Q. They took issue with the fact that you have testified in criminal cases predominantly for the defense?\n5\n6 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n7 THE COURT: Grounds.\n8 MS. POMERANTZ: Mischaracterization, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled.\n10 Q. You have worked as a consultant for the federal government, have you not?\n11\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. For the Secret Service; correct?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. For the Department of Justice; correct?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. For the FBI; correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. For the Internal Revenue Service; correct?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And those entities were aware that you have provided testimony for defendants in criminal matters; correct?\n22\n23 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n24 THE COURT: Grounds.\n25 MS. POMERANTZ: Foundation.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016672",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 189 of 246",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCGVMAX5 Loftus - redirect 2484",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n2 A. Yes, I do.\n3 THE COURT: I'm going to sustain.\n4 Q. They took issue with the fact that you have testified in criminal cases predominantly for the defense?\n5\n6 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n7 THE COURT: Grounds.\n8 MS. POMERANTZ: Mischaracterization, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled.\n10 Q. You have worked as a consultant for the federal government, have you not?\n11\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. For the Secret Service; correct?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. For the Department of Justice; correct?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. For the FBI; correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. For the Internal Revenue Service; correct?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And those entities were aware that you have provided testimony for defendants in criminal matters; correct?\n22\n23 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.\n24 THE COURT: Grounds.\n25 MS. POMERANTZ: Foundation.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016672",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. POMERANTZ"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Secret Service",
      "Department of Justice",
      "FBI",
      "Internal Revenue Service",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "761",
      "DOJ-OGR-00016672"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}