DOJ-OGR-00016789.json 3.6 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "60",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "Court Transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 60 of 197\nLCHVMAX2 Richards - direct\n1 Q. Right. And you've done a lot of interviews between 14 years ago and now, I assume?\n2 A. Probably thousands.\n3 Q. Now, is part of the reason why you are trained to take notes and to record events accurately, so that months or years later you will have a document such as this that you can testify from and be confident that what you put in the document is accurate?\n4 A. That's for reference, yes.\n5 Q. Okay. What I'd like to do is direct you to some specific statements in this JR-1 that we've marked for identification purposes.\n6 First of all, do you recall that on August 7th, 2007, you spoke with Carolyn? And we're identifying this person only by the name of \"Carolyn.\"\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And again, when you spoke with Carolyn, you were gathering information relative to your investigation at that time; correct?\n9 A. That's correct.\n10 Q. When you spoke with Carolyn, consistent with your training and experience, you were attempting to get as much information as possible; is that correct?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And you were not limiting any of the responses given to you\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016789",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 60 of 197",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LCHVMAX2 Richards - direct",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Q. Right. And you've done a lot of interviews between 14 years ago and now, I assume?\n2 A. Probably thousands.\n3 Q. Now, is part of the reason why you are trained to take notes and to record events accurately, so that months or years later you will have a document such as this that you can testify from and be confident that what you put in the document is accurate?\n4 A. That's for reference, yes.\n5 Q. Okay. What I'd like to do is direct you to some specific statements in this JR-1 that we've marked for identification purposes.\n6 First of all, do you recall that on August 7th, 2007, you spoke with Carolyn? And we're identifying this person only by the name of \"Carolyn.\"\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And again, when you spoke with Carolyn, you were gathering information relative to your investigation at that time; correct?\n9 A. That's correct.\n10 Q. When you spoke with Carolyn, consistent with your training and experience, you were attempting to get as much information as possible; is that correct?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And you were not limiting any of the responses given to you",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016789",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Carolyn"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  44. ],
  45. "locations": [],
  46. "dates": [
  47. "August 7th, 2007",
  48. "08/10/22"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  52. "763",
  53. "JR-1",
  54. "DOJ-OGR-00016789"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }