| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "145",
- "document_number": "763",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 145 of 197\nLCHVMAX4 2686\n1 witness is represented in connection with this case.\n2 THE COURT: Okay.\n3 MS. MENNINGER: There was no counsel appointed for\n4 this witness as there were with other witnesses.\n5 THE COURT: And so the efforts made to contact the\n6 witness consisted of what?\n7 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I was not the one doing it\n8 myself. I can get the detail from my assistants who were\n9 making the calls, and also our investigator that was making the\n10 calls. I can get the dates and times of the calls. I don't\n11 have that on me at the moment.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. I think I need to understand, since\n13 I'm -- given where we are and what I'm -- in the trial, and I\n14 see that the subpoena -- so the subpoena was -- the return date\n15 was for the first day of trial.\n16 So I would like details as to what efforts were made\n17 to contact the witness. I guess the other question is the\n18 testimony that you're seeking from this witness is the same\n19 essentially as the last two witnesses?\n20 MS. MENNINGER: It's very similar, your Honor.\n21 There's only one distinction with this one. On this one, Jane\n22 told the government early on that Kelly could confirm her story\n23 about what was going on. That's in the 3500. I can pull up\n24 the exact verbiage. And she also gave the woman's last name.\n25 So it was highly specific reference that this -- she also said\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016874",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 145 of 197",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "LCHVMAX4 2686",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "1 witness is represented in connection with this case.\n2 THE COURT: Okay.\n3 MS. MENNINGER: There was no counsel appointed for\n4 this witness as there were with other witnesses.\n5 THE COURT: And so the efforts made to contact the\n6 witness consisted of what?\n7 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I was not the one doing it\n8 myself. I can get the detail from my assistants who were\n9 making the calls, and also our investigator that was making the\n10 calls. I can get the dates and times of the calls. I don't\n11 have that on me at the moment.\n12 THE COURT: Okay. I think I need to understand, since\n13 I'm -- given where we are and what I'm -- in the trial, and I\n14 see that the subpoena -- so the subpoena was -- the return date\n15 was for the first day of trial.\n16 So I would like details as to what efforts were made\n17 to contact the witness. I guess the other question is the\n18 testimony that you're seeking from this witness is the same\n19 essentially as the last two witnesses?\n20 MS. MENNINGER: It's very similar, your Honor.\n21 There's only one distinction with this one. On this one, Jane\n22 told the government early on that Kelly could confirm her story\n23 about what was going on. That's in the 3500. I can pull up\n24 the exact verbiage. And she also gave the woman's last name.\n25 So it was highly specific reference that this -- she also said",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016874",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. MENNINGER",
- "Jane",
- "Kelly"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "THE COURT",
- "government"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "763",
- "3500",
- "DOJ-OGR-00016874"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
- }
|