DOJ-OGR-00016890.json 4.0 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "161",
  4. "document_number": "763",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 197 2702 LCHCmax5 lived there from '92 to '93; right? In fact, your argument is it's a factual impossibility that she lived there in '92, '93? MR. EVERDELL: I'm saying the witness is mistaken based on the property records, yes, your Honor. MS. MOE: Just like Ms. Maxwell, your Honor. That's why this is such a sideshow. THE COURT: Look, I always say, I have so many bridges to across, I cross the bridge that's in front of me. So what is the question? MR. EVERDELL: Well, so, there are, I think, a few questions. We still have to confer on the stipulation to the Kinnerton Street records. We are going to propose being able to admit the land registry records showing the transfer of title of both the Kinnerton Street residence and the Stanhope Mews residence. Those are both land registry documents. And by the way, your Honor, those are selfauthenticating because they came from the land registry and they are selfauthenticating foreign public documents. Those can be admitted just by themselves, but we want a stipulation to the fact that they reflect certain information. And I think what the Court said is if we're going to be permitted to admit those, the defense should be able to permit -- sorry. The prosecution should be able to admit that deposition testimony from when Ms. Maxwell said '92, '93. So we have to -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016890",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 161 of 197 2702 LCHCmax5",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "lived there from '92 to '93; right? In fact, your argument is it's a factual impossibility that she lived there in '92, '93? MR. EVERDELL: I'm saying the witness is mistaken based on the property records, yes, your Honor. MS. MOE: Just like Ms. Maxwell, your Honor. That's why this is such a sideshow. THE COURT: Look, I always say, I have so many bridges to across, I cross the bridge that's in front of me. So what is the question? MR. EVERDELL: Well, so, there are, I think, a few questions. We still have to confer on the stipulation to the Kinnerton Street records. We are going to propose being able to admit the land registry records showing the transfer of title of both the Kinnerton Street residence and the Stanhope Mews residence. Those are both land registry documents. And by the way, your Honor, those are selfauthenticating because they came from the land registry and they are selfauthenticating foreign public documents. Those can be admitted just by themselves, but we want a stipulation to the fact that they reflect certain information. And I think what the Court said is if we're going to be permitted to admit those, the defense should be able to permit -- sorry. The prosecution should be able to admit that deposition testimony from when Ms. Maxwell said '92, '93. So we have to --",
  20. "position": "main content"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016890",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "MR. EVERDELL",
  36. "MS. MOE",
  37. "MS. MAXWELL"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
  41. "land registry"
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [
  44. "Kinnerton Street",
  45. "Stanhope Mews"
  46. ],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "'92",
  49. "'93",
  50. "08/10/22"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  54. "763",
  55. "DOJ-OGR-00016890"
  56. ]
  57. },
  58. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  59. }