DOJ-OGR-00016973.json 3.7 KB

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "47",
  4. "document_number": "765",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 47 of 95 2785 LCI1MAX1\n1 word \"defendant\" with \"Ms. Maxwell.\" We tried to pick the ones\n2 which made sense, and I understand the Court did the same.\n3 THE COURT: I was trying to do that as well, as is\n4 typical in my charges.\n5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, understood.\n6 So I think our next one is not until -- I'm just\n7 checking with my colleagues -- is not until page 49, but give\n8 me one minute.\n9 THE COURT: Okay.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Okay. Actually, your Honor, if we go\n11 back to page 44.\n12 THE COURT: 44? Okay.\n13 MR. EVERDELL: So this is line 4. We have the word\n14 \"minors\" again, right? This is a discussion of the elements of\n15 the conspiracy, but, \"Count One charges Ms. Maxwell with\n16 participating in a conspiracy\" etc., etc. \"to entice minors to\n17 travel and engage in sexual activity.\" And there are other\n18 instances of \"minors\" in line 15. It's \"to transport minors.\"\n19 THE COURT: So for all of these, this would be \"an individual under the age of 17.\"\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Well, yes. So it's going to be line 4,\n21 line 6, line 15, and line 19.\n22\n23 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach?\n24 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor. And I would\n25 note in the next paragraph, there is a reference to \"minor,\"\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00016973",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 47 of 95 2785 LCI1MAX1",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "1 word \"defendant\" with \"Ms. Maxwell.\" We tried to pick the ones\n2 which made sense, and I understand the Court did the same.\n3 THE COURT: I was trying to do that as well, as is\n4 typical in my charges.\n5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, understood.\n6 So I think our next one is not until -- I'm just\n7 checking with my colleagues -- is not until page 49, but give\n8 me one minute.\n9 THE COURT: Okay.\n10 MR. EVERDELL: Okay. Actually, your Honor, if we go\n11 back to page 44.\n12 THE COURT: 44? Okay.\n13 MR. EVERDELL: So this is line 4. We have the word\n14 \"minors\" again, right? This is a discussion of the elements of\n15 the conspiracy, but, \"Count One charges Ms. Maxwell with\n16 participating in a conspiracy\" etc., etc. \"to entice minors to\n17 travel and engage in sexual activity.\" And there are other\n18 instances of \"minors\" in line 15. It's \"to transport minors.\"\n19 THE COURT: So for all of these, this would be \"an individual under the age of 17.\"\n20 MR. EVERDELL: Well, yes. So it's going to be line 4,\n21 line 6, line 15, and line 19.\n22\n23 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach?\n24 MR. ROHRBACH: That's fine, your Honor. And I would\n25 note in the next paragraph, there is a reference to \"minor,\"",
  20. "position": "main"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  25. "position": "footer"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00016973",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. }
  32. ],
  33. "entities": {
  34. "people": [
  35. "Ms. Maxwell",
  36. "Mr. Everdell",
  37. "Mr. Rohrbach"
  38. ],
  39. "organizations": [
  40. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  41. ],
  42. "locations": [],
  43. "dates": [
  44. "08/10/22"
  45. ],
  46. "reference_numbers": [
  47. "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
  48. "765",
  49. "DOJ-OGR-00016973"
  50. ]
  51. },
  52. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  53. }