mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00016982.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "56",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 56 of 95\nLCI1MAX1\n1 conspiracy to violate the offense with the age of consent of 17, even though elsewhere Carolyn is charged with an age of consent of 18.\n2\n3 THE COURT: I presume you have no objection?\n4\n5 MR. EVERDELL: No objection, your Honor.\n6\n7 THE COURT: Yes. Let me just think about that.\n8\n9 I see. Okay. All right. So Instruction 36, line 21, changing \"Carolyn was under the age of 18\" to \"the age of 17.\" Yeah, that's right.\n10 Okay. Next.\n11\n12 MR. EVERDELL: Next one, lines, on that page, 23 to 24, and on the following page, lines 1 through 10, it tracks the same changes for the transportation charge.\n13\n14 MR. ROHRBACH: That makes sense, I think, your Honor.\n15\n16 THE COURT: Okay. Let me see if I can do these. Line 24, changing \"age of 18\" to \"age of 17,\" and then line 2, changing \"age of 18\" to 17. Line 4, cutting the clause \"when Annie was under the age of 18,\" and then cutting overt act regarding Kate at No. 4. So that's lines 6 through 8. And then line 19, changing 18 to 17.\n17\n18 MR. EVERDELL: Correct, your Honor.\n19\n20 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, you would also want to change the bracketed No. 5 to No. 4.\n21\n22 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Sternheim. Changing the fifth listed overt act to the fourth listed overt act. Just\n23\n24 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 56 of 95",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCI1MAX1",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 conspiracy to violate the offense with the age of consent of 17, even though elsewhere Carolyn is charged with an age of consent of 18.\nTHE COURT: I presume you have no objection?\nMR. EVERDELL: No objection, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Yes. Let me just think about that.\nI see. Okay. All right. So Instruction 36, line 21, changing \"Carolyn was under the age of 18\" to \"the age of 17.\" Yeah, that's right.\nOkay. Next.\nMR. EVERDELL: Next one, lines, on that page, 23 to 24, and on the following page, lines 1 through 10, it tracks the same changes for the transportation charge.\nMR. ROHRBACH: That makes sense, I think, your Honor.\nTHE COURT: Okay. Let me see if I can do these. Line 24, changing \"age of 18\" to \"age of 17,\" and then line 2, changing \"age of 18\" to 17. Line 4, cutting the clause \"when Annie was under the age of 18,\" and then cutting overt act regarding Kate at No. 4. So that's lines 6 through 8. And then line 19, changing 18 to 17.\nMR. EVERDELL: Correct, your Honor.\nMS. STERNHEIM: Judge, you would also want to change the bracketed No. 5 to No. 4.\nTHE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Sternheim. Changing the fifth listed overt act to the fourth listed overt act. Just",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MS. STERNHEIM",
      "Annie",
      "Kate"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a discussion about changing the age of consent in a legal case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The footer contains the name and contact information of the reporting agency."
}