mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES006/DOJ-OGR-00017001.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "75",
    "document_number": "765",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 95 2813 LCIAMAX2ps\n\nSo that's the proposal. And when would you like to put in a letter?\nMR. ROHRBACH: Depends on what time we finish.\nMR. EVERDELL: First thing, your Honor.\nMR. ROHRBACH: If we finish by noon, by 2 or 3?\nTHE COURT: OK. Let's do 2 o'clock.\nMR. ROHRBACH: OK.\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\nNext.\nMR. EVERDELL: Next, your Honor, is page 68, instruction no. 50, the uncalled witnesses charge. The request here is that this not be included, and I think the reason being that, in this case, it isn't really accurately summarizing the state of play, because, you know, for example, there were witnesses who took their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to testify as defense witnesses because they invoked their Fifth Amendment rights. The government does have the option of giving those witnesses immunity to testify. And so they actually control, more than we do, whether or not a witness can appear --\nTHE COURT: To be clear, that didn't happen. They didn't call that witness.\nMR. EVERDELL: We had a witness who invoked their Fifth Amendment rights or had written the Court that they planned to invoke, and that we called and was under subpoena\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00017001",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 95 2813 LCIAMAX2ps",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "So that's the proposal. And when would you like to put in a letter?\nMR. ROHRBACH: Depends on what time we finish.\nMR. EVERDELL: First thing, your Honor.\nMR. ROHRBACH: If we finish by noon, by 2 or 3?\nTHE COURT: OK. Let's do 2 o'clock.\nMR. ROHRBACH: OK.\nTHE COURT: Thank you.\nNext.\nMR. EVERDELL: Next, your Honor, is page 68, instruction no. 50, the uncalled witnesses charge. The request here is that this not be included, and I think the reason being that, in this case, it isn't really accurately summarizing the state of play, because, you know, for example, there were witnesses who took their Fifth Amendment rights and refused to testify as defense witnesses because they invoked their Fifth Amendment rights. The government does have the option of giving those witnesses immunity to testify. And so they actually control, more than we do, whether or not a witness can appear --\nTHE COURT: To be clear, that didn't happen. They didn't call that witness.\nMR. EVERDELL: We had a witness who invoked their Fifth Amendment rights or had written the Court that they planned to invoke, and that we called and was under subpoena",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00017001",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "765",
      "68",
      "50",
      "DOJ-OGR-00017001",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}