mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00018868.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 262 1711 LC8Cmax1\n\n1    In any event, I'm still unclear what the decision\n2 point is. You have decisions to make as to who to call, but\n3 you're not seeking anything --\n4    MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. And if I were to call\n5 her and ask her something outside of the prior consistent\n6 statements, we would brief that to your Honor or bring that up\n7 in advance, we would not just do that. It's just that, as your\n8 Honor has seen, they shaved a substantial amount of their case\n9 off and are not calling a number of witnesses that they\n10 intended to call, and we are assessing who we need to call in\n11 getting those people here and so forth.\n12    So I just, in asking you right this second, what\n13 decision we've made about our case in chief, I can't give your\n14 Honor an answer.\n15    THE COURT: I understand that. I don't think I was\n16 seeking that.\n17    Mr. Rohrbach, you just began by asking whether they\n18 intended to recall Jane. They don't know.\n19    MR. ROHRBACH: Right.\n20    THE COURT: And whether they intend to call Brian,\n21 they don't know.\n22    MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n23    The other issue the government wanted to just flag for\n24 the Court is there is a possibility that we'd get to victim 2\n25 by the end of the day today, and I know the Court has --\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00018868",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 262 1711 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    In any event, I'm still unclear what the decision\n2 point is. You have decisions to make as to who to call, but\n3 you're not seeking anything --\n4    MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. And if I were to call\n5 her and ask her something outside of the prior consistent\n6 statements, we would brief that to your Honor or bring that up\n7 in advance, we would not just do that. It's just that, as your\n8 Honor has seen, they shaved a substantial amount of their case\n9 off and are not calling a number of witnesses that they\n10 intended to call, and we are assessing who we need to call in\n11 getting those people here and so forth.\n12    So I just, in asking you right this second, what\n13 decision we've made about our case in chief, I can't give your\n14 Honor an answer.\n15    THE COURT: I understand that. I don't think I was\n16 seeking that.\n17    Mr. Rohrbach, you just began by asking whether they\n18 intended to recall Jane. They don't know.\n19    MR. ROHRBACH: Right.\n20    THE COURT: And whether they intend to call Brian,\n21 they don't know.\n22    MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.\n23    The other issue the government wanted to just flag for\n24 the Court is there is a possibility that we'd get to victim 2\n25 by the end of the day today, and I know the Court has --",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00018868",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Jane",
      "Brian"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00018868"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}