mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019137.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "757",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 49 1986 LC9VMAXT\n1 law enforcement agent, who had no involvement in the\n2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony\n3 essentially pursuant to 1006.\n4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for\n5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn\n6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I\n7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that\n8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two\n9 things.\n10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing\n11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're\n12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the\n13 closing.\n14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the\n15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,\n16 and then we move on, without a witness?\n17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I\n18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a\n19 witness or without a witness?\n20 THE COURT: Without a witness.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The\n22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at\n23 that?\n24 THE COURT: Yes.\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00019137",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 757 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 49 1986 LC9VMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 law enforcement agent, who had no involvement in the\n2 investigation of the case and who isn't providing testimony\n3 essentially pursuant to 1006.\n4 MS. MOE: Your Honor, if the Court's preference is for\n5 us to, without a person on the stand, just ask the jury to turn\n6 from one exhibit to another to another, we can do that. I\n7 think that is slightly more awkward than facilitating that\n8 through a witness and pointing out the connections between two\n9 things.\n10 THE COURT: Right. But the witness is providing\n11 testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're\n12 simply asking them to do the work of the government in the\n13 closing.\n14 So, Mr. Pagliuca, do you have any objection to the\n15 government publishing a few documents, going to a few points,\n16 and then we move on, without a witness?\n17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand that process, I\n18 guess, your Honor. We're simply going to -- is this with a\n19 witness or without a witness?\n20 THE COURT: Without a witness.\n21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We're simply going to say, The\n22 government would like the jury to look at this and then look at\n23 that?\n24 THE COURT: Yes.\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do object to that process, your",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019137",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "757",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019137"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}