mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019355.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "13",
    "document_number": "37",
    "date": "09/16/2020",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 37, 09/16/2020, 2932231, Page13 of 24\nat issue is not related to any right not to stand trial.” Id. at 26.\n2. Appeals Involving Injunctions\n15. Title 28, United States Code, Section 1292(a)(1) provides that Courts of Appeals shall have jurisdiction over “[i]nterlocutory orders of the district courts of the United States . . . or of the judges thereof, granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court.”\nOrders regulating discovery in a criminal case, even if couched “using words of restraint,” are not injunctions and are therefore not appealable under § 1292(a)(1).\nSee Pappas, 94 F.3d at 798 (“Protective orders that only regulate materials exchanged between the parties incident to litigation, like most discovery orders, are neither final orders, appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, nor injunctions, appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1.” (internal citations omitted)); Caparros, 800 F.2d at 26.\nB. Discussion\n16. There is no dispute that the Order is not a final judgment and thus is not appealable unless it fits within the “small class” of decisions that constitute immediately appealable collateral orders. Van Cauwenberghe, 486 U.S. at 522. Because the Order does not fall within the extremely narrow category of collateral orders that are appealable in criminal cases, where the collateral order\n12\nDOJ-OGR-00019355",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 37, 09/16/2020, 2932231, Page13 of 24",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "at issue is not related to any right not to stand trial.” Id. at 26.\n2. Appeals Involving Injunctions\n15. Title 28, United States Code, Section 1292(a)(1) provides that Courts of Appeals shall have jurisdiction over “[i]nterlocutory orders of the district courts of the United States . . . or of the judges thereof, granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court.”\nOrders regulating discovery in a criminal case, even if couched “using words of restraint,” are not injunctions and are therefore not appealable under § 1292(a)(1).\nSee Pappas, 94 F.3d at 798 (“Protective orders that only regulate materials exchanged between the parties incident to litigation, like most discovery orders, are neither final orders, appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, nor injunctions, appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1.” (internal citations omitted)); Caparros, 800 F.2d at 26.\nB. Discussion\n16. There is no dispute that the Order is not a final judgment and thus is not appealable unless it fits within the “small class” of decisions that constitute immediately appealable collateral orders. Van Cauwenberghe, 486 U.S. at 522. Because the Order does not fall within the extremely narrow category of collateral orders that are appealable in criminal cases, where the collateral order",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "12",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019355",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Supreme Court",
      "Courts of Appeals"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "09/16/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "37",
      "2932231",
      "28 U.S.C. § 1291",
      "28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019355"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a specific case (20-3061). The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content discusses legal matters related to appeals and injunctions."
}