mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019397.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "54",
    "date": "09/23/2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 54, 09/23/2020, 2937091, Page4 of 6\n\nthe Government's applications to modify certain protective orders in other judicial proceedings.\" Ms. Maxwell's point is that, unless the unsealing order is reversed, she might not ever be able to litigate \"the lawfulness of the Government's applications.\"\n\nMoreover, the motion to consolidate is not an attempt to circumvent Judge Nathan's order before this Court can reach the merits. The motion to consolidate simply endeavors to ensure that this Court does not find itself in the same position as the several judges below, where only some of the judges are privy to the relevant facts.\n\nThere is no merit to Ms. Giuffre's argument that consolidation will cause meaningful delay. Doc. 123, pp 4-5. This Court has scheduled oral argument in both cases on the same day, as well as an argument on the motion to consolidate.\n\nWhether that motion is granted or not will have no effect on the dispatch with which this Court addresses the issues.\n\nThis Court should grant the motion to consolidate.\n\nSeptember 23, 2020.\n\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00019397",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 54, 09/23/2020, 2937091, Page4 of 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "the Government's applications to modify certain protective orders in other judicial proceedings.\" Ms. Maxwell's point is that, unless the unsealing order is reversed, she might not ever be able to litigate \"the lawfulness of the Government's applications.\"\n\nMoreover, the motion to consolidate is not an attempt to circumvent Judge Nathan's order before this Court can reach the merits. The motion to consolidate simply endeavors to ensure that this Court does not find itself in the same position as the several judges below, where only some of the judges are privy to the relevant facts.\n\nThere is no merit to Ms. Giuffre's argument that consolidation will cause meaningful delay. Doc. 123, pp 4-5. This Court has scheduled oral argument in both cases on the same day, as well as an argument on the motion to consolidate.\n\nWhether that motion is granted or not will have no effect on the dispatch with which this Court addresses the issues.\n\nThis Court should grant the motion to consolidate.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "September 23, 2020.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019397",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Judge Nathan",
      "Ms. Giuffre"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "September 23, 2020",
      "09/23/2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 20-3061",
      "Document 54",
      "Doc. 123",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019397"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case involving Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Giuffre. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations. The document is page 4 of 6."
}