| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "38 of 58",
- "document_number": "60",
- "date": "09/24/2020",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page38 of 58\n\nMartindell, 594 F.2d at 296. But unless Judge Nathan's order is reversed in the criminal case, Ms. Maxwell cannot share this information with Judge Preska in the civil case.8\n\nConclusion\n\nIn the end, the government's argument amounts to little more than this:\n\nJudge Preska should remain in the dark. But there's no principled justification for that position, and this Court should reject it.\n\nThis Court should reverse the district court's order denying Ms. Maxwell's motion to modify the protective order.\n\nSeptember 24, 2020.\n\n8 Nor, unless the cases are consolidated, will the panel of this Court considering the civil appeal know [REDACTED]\n\n33\n\nDOJ-OGR-00019437",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page38 of 58",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296. But unless Judge Nathan's order is reversed in the criminal case, Ms. Maxwell cannot share this information with Judge Preska in the civil case.8",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Conclusion",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "In the end, the government's argument amounts to little more than this:\n\nJudge Preska should remain in the dark. But there's no principled justification for that position, and this Court should reject it.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "This Court should reverse the district court's order denying Ms. Maxwell's motion to modify the protective order.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "September 24, 2020.",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "8 Nor, unless the cases are consolidated, will the panel of this Court considering the civil appeal know [REDACTED]",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "33",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019437",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Judge Nathan",
- "Ms. Maxwell",
- "Judge Preska"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Court"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "September 24, 2020",
- "09/24/2020"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20-3061",
- "60",
- "2938278",
- "DOJ-OGR-00019437"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document contains a redacted section. The text is mostly printed, with no handwritten content or stamps visible."
- }
|