mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019587.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "63",
    "date": "09/24/2020",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 63, 09/24/2020, 2938282, Page3 of 6\nyesterday). Ms. Maxwell also requests leave to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of Appendix Volume 2 on ECF. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:\nThis appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413, addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms. Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals. Oral argument in both appeals is scheduled for October 13.\n1) The unredacted opening brief references material currently under seal and/or shielded by the criminal protective order.\n2) Appendix Volume 2 includes all the relevant district court material that is sealed/confidential under the criminal protective.\n3) The unredacted version of Ms. Maxwell's response to the government's opposition to the motion to consolidate makes brief reference to confidential/sealed information.\nTo comply with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell can file unredacted versions of this material only under seal with this Court.\nIn compliance with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell will publicly file on ECF a redacted copy of her opening brief. She already filed a\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00019587",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 63, 09/24/2020, 2938282, Page3 of 6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "yesterday). Ms. Maxwell also requests leave to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of Appendix Volume 2 on ECF. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states:\nThis appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413, addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms. Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals. Oral argument in both appeals is scheduled for October 13.\n1) The unredacted opening brief references material currently under seal and/or shielded by the criminal protective order.\n2) Appendix Volume 2 includes all the relevant district court material that is sealed/confidential under the criminal protective.\n3) The unredacted version of Ms. Maxwell's response to the government's opposition to the motion to consolidate makes brief reference to confidential/sealed information.\nTo comply with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell can file unredacted versions of this material only under seal with this Court.\nIn compliance with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell will publicly file on ECF a redacted copy of her opening brief. She already filed a",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019587",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Judge Nathan",
      "Judge Preska"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Court",
      "ECF"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "09/24/2020",
      "October 13"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "20-3061",
      "63",
      "2938282",
      "20-2413",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019587"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. It discusses the handling of sealed and confidential information in relation to a criminal protective order. The document is well-formatted and clear, with no visible redactions or damage."
}