| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889909192 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "3",
- "document_number": "94",
- "date": "10/08/2020",
- "document_type": "Table of Authorities",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page3 of 23\n\nTable of Authorities\n\nCases\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................8, 16\nIn re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)...............................................1\nMartindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979)................................................passim\nNixon v. Warner Commc'ns, 435 U.S. 589 (1978)...............................................16\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993).....2\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986).......................................5\nUnited States v. Sells Eng'g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983).......................................14\nWill v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006)................................................2, 7\n\nStatutes\n28 U.S.C. § 1291........................................................3\n\nRules\nFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)................................................13, 14\n\nConstitutional Provisions\nU.S. CONST. amend. V................................................9, 16\nU.S. CONST. amend. VI ................................................16\nii\nDOJ-OGR-00019649",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page3 of 23",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Table of Authorities",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Cases\nBrown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019)...............................................8, 16\nIn re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2011)...............................................1\nMartindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979)................................................passim\nNixon v. Warner Commc'ns, 435 U.S. 589 (1978)...............................................16\nPuerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139 (1993).....2\nUnited States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986).......................................5\nUnited States v. Sells Eng'g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983).......................................14\nWill v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006)................................................2, 7",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Statutes\n28 U.S.C. § 1291........................................................3",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Rules\nFed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)................................................13, 14",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Constitutional Provisions\nU.S. CONST. amend. V................................................9, 16\nU.S. CONST. amend. VI ................................................16",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "ii",
- "position": "bottom"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019649",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Brown",
- "Maxwell",
- "Martindell",
- "Nixon",
- "Will",
- "Hallock"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Teligent, Inc.",
- "International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.",
- "Warner Commc'ns",
- "Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth.",
- "Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.",
- "United States",
- "Sells Eng'g, Inc."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Puerto Rico"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "2019",
- "2011",
- "1979",
- "1978",
- "1993",
- "1986",
- "1983",
- "2006"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "20-3061",
- "94",
- "2948481",
- "DOJ-OGR-00019649"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a table of authorities from a legal case, with a clear and organized structure. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|