mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019938.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "79",
    "document_number": "39-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page79 of 200\n16\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n1    include electronic materials, to be due by Monday, November 9\n2    of this year, and following that we would propose the following\n3    motion schedule: that defense motions be due by Monday,\n4    December 21 of this year; that the government's response be due\n5    on Friday, January 22, 2021; and that replies be due on Friday,\n6    February 5, 2021.\n7\n8    THE COURT: All right. Mr. Cohen, based on the government's description of both the quantity and quality of\n9    discovery, is that schedule that's been laid out sufficient from your perspective to do everything that you need to do?\n10\n11    MR. COHEN: Your Honor, just two points in that regard. I think counsel for the government did not mention in\n12    the e-mail we had sent to your Honor's law clerk that August 21 would be the deadline for production of search warrant\n13    applications and the subpoena returns. I think she just failed to mention it for the record. That would also be part of the\n14    schedule.\n15\n16    THE COURT: Thank you.\n17    Ms. Moe, do you agree?\n18\n19    MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I apologize. We did include that in the e-mail to your Honor's chambers, and\n20    that is correct.\n21\n22    And thank you, counsel, for clarifying that.\n23\n24    MR. COHEN: Two additional points, your Honor. The trial schedule that we are agreeing to, of course subject to\n25\n    SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n    DOJ-OGR-00019938",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page79 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "k7e2MaxC kjc",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1    include electronic materials, to be due by Monday, November 9\n2    of this year, and following that we would propose the following\n3    motion schedule: that defense motions be due by Monday,\n4    December 21 of this year; that the government's response be due\n5    on Friday, January 22, 2021; and that replies be due on Friday,\n6    February 5, 2021.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: All right. Mr. Cohen, based on the government's description of both the quantity and quality of\ndiscovery, is that schedule that's been laid out sufficient from your perspective to do everything that you need to do?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. COHEN: Your Honor, just two points in that regard. I think counsel for the government did not mention in\nthe e-mail we had sent to your Honor's law clerk that August 21 would be the deadline for production of search warrant\napplications and the subpoena returns. I think she just failed to mention it for the record. That would also be part of the\nschedule.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Thank you.\nMs. Moe, do you agree?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. I apologize. We did include that in the e-mail to your Honor's chambers, and\nthat is correct.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "And thank you, counsel, for clarifying that.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. COHEN: Two additional points, your Honor. The trial schedule that we are agreeing to, of course subject to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00019938",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Cohen",
      "Ms. Moe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "November 9",
      "December 21",
      "January 22, 2021",
      "February 5, 2021",
      "August 21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-58",
      "Document 39-2",
      "3068530",
      "DOJ-OGR-00019938"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}