mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00020012.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "153",
    "document_number": "39-2",
    "date": "04/01/2021",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page153 of 200\n\nevidentiary hearing within one week. In contrast, the\ndefendant is in the same position as any newly indicted\ndefendant who is incarcerated in terms of the need to access\ncounsel. Indeed the defense's logic, all pretrial detainees\ncurrently incarcerated at MDC and any federal facility would\nneed to be released to prepare their defense. To the contrary,\nthe MDC has continued to develop procedures to ensure\nattorney-client access at the facility, and the defendants\ndetained at MDC are able to conduct video and phone conferences\nwith their attorneys. There is ongoing litigation before\nJudge Brodie in the Eastern District of New York about the\nadequacy of attorney-client access at the MDC. That is case\nNo. 19 Civ. 660. Public filings from the court-appointed\nmediator in that case describe the availability of legal phone\ncalls and video calls, video conferences for the purposes of\nreviewing discovery between detained defendants and their\ncounsel, and that same report indicates that MDC is currently\ndeveloping a plan to resume in-person attorney-client visits in\nthe near future.\n\nAt this stage in this case and at this point in the\npandemic in New York City, these measures are sufficient to\nensure Ms. Maxwell has access to her counsel. To further\nassuage these concerns, the court orders the government in this\ncase, and frankly all others before it, to work with the\ndefense to provide adequate communication between counsel and\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020012",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page153 of 200",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "evidentiary hearing within one week. In contrast, the\ndefendant is in the same position as any newly indicted\ndefendant who is incarcerated in terms of the need to access\ncounsel. Indeed the defense's logic, all pretrial detainees\ncurrently incarcerated at MDC and any federal facility would\nneed to be released to prepare their defense. To the contrary,\nthe MDC has continued to develop procedures to ensure\nattorney-client access at the facility, and the defendants\ndetained at MDC are able to conduct video and phone conferences\nwith their attorneys. There is ongoing litigation before\nJudge Brodie in the Eastern District of New York about the\nadequacy of attorney-client access at the MDC. That is case\nNo. 19 Civ. 660. Public filings from the court-appointed\nmediator in that case describe the availability of legal phone\ncalls and video calls, video conferences for the purposes of\nreviewing discovery between detained defendants and their\ncounsel, and that same report indicates that MDC is currently\ndeveloping a plan to resume in-person attorney-client visits in\nthe near future.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "At this stage in this case and at this point in the\npandemic in New York City, these measures are sufficient to\nensure Ms. Maxwell has access to her counsel. To further\nassuage these concerns, the court orders the government in this\ncase, and frankly all others before it, to work with the\ndefense to provide adequate communication between counsel and",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020012",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Brodie"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "MDC",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York City",
      "Eastern District of New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/01/2021"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 21-58",
      "Document 39-2",
      "3068530",
      "No. 19 Civ. 660",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020012"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text is printed and there are no visible handwritten notes or stamps. The document is well-formatted and easy to read."
}