mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020518.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "32",
    "document_number": "3-2",
    "date": "07/08/2022",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page32 of 92\n\n04/19/2021)\n\n| Date | Dkt No. | Description |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 04/20/2021 | 220 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) granting in part and denying in part 219 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 19, 2021 re: request for extension of time to respond to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order. ENDORSEMENT: The Government's request is granted in part and denied in part. It shall respond to Dkt. No. 216 by no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/20/2021) (ap) (Entered: 04/20/2021) |\n| 04/20/2021 | 221 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the Defendant to file written answers to the following specific questions by 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 22, 2021: 1. Does defense counsel continue to seek an adjournment of the July 12th start date for trial on the non-perjury counts? 2. If the answer to question 1 is yes, what is the specific request being made as to length of adjournment? In particular, is the request for a 90-day adjournment? An adjournment until January 2022? Or something else? The Court requires a specific request be made and justified or it will not be considered. If Maxwell continues to seek an adjournment, the Government may submit any response by 5:00 pm on April 22, 2021. The Court will consider the submissions and resolve expeditiously. As noted, however, unless and until an adjournment is specifically requested and granted, the parties shall assume that the Court will request a jury selection date as close to July 12th as possible and shall plan accordingly. SO ORDERED. (See ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 04/20/2021) |\n| 04/20/2021 | 222 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 20, 2021 re: Redactions to Defense Reply Briefs and Exhibits Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 04/20/2021) |\n| 04/20/2021 | 223 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 141 MOTION to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of Non-Prosecution Agreement. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Sealed) (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/20/2021) |\n| 04/20/2021 | 224 | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 119 MOTION for Separate Trial on Counts Ghislaine Maxwell (1) Count 5s-6s,5-6 ... (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/20/2021) |\n| 04/21/2021 | 225 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated April 21, 2021 re: Grand Jury Motion (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 04/21/2021) |\n| 04/21/2021 | 226 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's and Boies Schiller Flexner LLPs April 19, 2021 joint letter responding to the Courts April 19, 2021 Order, Dkt. No. 215. The letter proposes limited redactions on the basis that some of the information is covered by the terms of the protective order in this case. In light of this, by April 22, 2021, the Defendant and BSF are hereby ORDERED to confer with the Government regarding whether the Government requests redaction of any information contained in the Defendant's response to BSF's objections to the Defendant's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, BSF's reply, and the April 19, 2021 joint letter addressing the redactions to these documents. The Government may submit any redaction requests by April 23, 2021; in doing so, the Government shall justify any proposed redactions by reference to the test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Defendant, BSF, and the Government are further ORDERED to notify the Court whether any party seeks redactions to the April 19, 2021 joint letter. If not, the Defendant shall file the letter on the public docket by April 23, 2021 (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/21/21)(jw) (Entered: 04/21/2021) |\n| 04/21/2021 | 227 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 21, 2021 re: in response to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 04/21/2021) |\n| 04/21/2021 | 228 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 225 Letter Grand Jury Motion... ENDORSEMENT: The motion to dismiss the SI superseding indictment on ... (Entered: 04/21/2021) |\nDOJ-OGR-00020518",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page32 of 92",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Date | Dkt No. | Description",
      "position": "table header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/20/2021 | 220 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) granting in part and denying in part 219 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated April 19, 2021 re: request for extension of time to respond to the Court's April 19, 2021 Order. ENDORSEMENT: The Government's request is granted in part and denied in part. It shall respond to Dkt. No. 216 by no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/20/2021) (ap) (Entered: 04/20/2021)",
      "position": "table row"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/20/2021 | 221 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for the Defendant to file written answers to the following specific questions by 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 22, 2021: 1. Does defense counsel continue to seek an adjournment of the July 12th start date for trial on the non-perjury counts? 2. If the answer to question 1 is yes, what is the specific request being made as to length of adjournment? In particular, is the request for a 90-day adjournment? An adjournment until January 2022? Or something else? The Court requires a specific request be made and justified or it will not be considered. If Maxwell continues to seek an adjournment, the Government may submit any response by 5:00 pm on April 22, 2021. The Court will consider the submissions and resolve expeditiously. As noted, however, unless and until an adjournment is specifically requested and granted, the parties shall assume that the Court will request a jury selection date as close to July 12th as possible and shall plan accordingly. SO ORDERED. (See ORDER as set forth) (lnl) (Entered: 04/20/2021)",
      "position": "table row"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020518",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Christian R. Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA",
      "Boies Schiller Flexner LLP"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "04/19/2021",
      "04/20/2021",
      "04/21/2021",
      "04/22/2021",
      "04/23/2021",
      "07/08/2022",
      "July 12th",
      "January 2022"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "3-2",
      "3344434",
      "220",
      "221",
      "222",
      "223",
      "224",
      "225",
      "226",
      "227",
      "228",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020518"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is a table with columns for date, docket number, and description. The descriptions include various court filings and orders related to the case."
}