DOJ-OGR-00020578.json 7.8 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "92 of 92",
  4. "document_number": "3-2",
  5. "date": "07/08/2022",
  6. "document_type": "Court Docket",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page92 of 92 November 22, 2021 Memorandum Opinion & Order re Expert Witness Gershman; - November 22, 2021 Memorandum Opinion & Order re Expert Witness Hall; - November 30, 2021 Scheduling Order re Pseudonym Conferral; - December 15, 2021 Order re Response Schedule. The Court is now docketing those items. In order to ensure a complete docket, the parties are ORDERED to confer and determine whether any letters or briefing submitted to the Court without a redaction or sealing request remain to be docketed. The Court has determined, for example, that the parties failed to file on the docket their December 15 letter briefing and December 16 joint letter regarding witness prior inconsistent statements. Any outstanding items, including any proposed redactions, must be filed on ECF by July 12, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/29/2022, United States Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 06/29/2022 695 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 06/29/2022 696 JUDGMENT In A Criminal Case (S2 20-Cr-330). Date of Imposition of Judgment: 6/29/2022. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (1) was found guilty on Count(s) 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss (judgment not entered on 1 & 5 as multipicitous, Dkt. No. 657). plea of not guilty. The defendant has been found not guilty on Count(s) 2ss. Count(s) 7ss-8ss, and underlying indictments are dismissed on the motion of the United States. IMPRISONMENT: The Defendant is sentenced to a term of 60 Months. Count 4 a sentence of 240 Months. Count 3 a sentence of 240 Months. Count 6 a sentence of 240 Months. All Counts to run concurrently. - Defendant was notified of her right to Appeal. - The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: Defendant to be considered for designation to FCI Danbury. Defendant to be considered for enrollment in FIT program. SUPERVISED RELEASE: 3 Years on Counts 3 and 4. 5 Years on Count 6 to run concurrently. Standard Conditions of Supervision (See page 5 of Judgment). Special Conditions of Supervision (See page 6 of Judgment). ASSESSMENT: $300.00, due immediately. FINE: $750,000.00. Schedule of Payments (See page 8 of Judgment). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/29/2022)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 06/29/2022 DISMISSAL OF COUNTS on Government Motion as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) Count 1s,1s,2s,3s,3s,4s,4s,5s-6s,5-6,7ss-8ss. (bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 07/07/2022 697 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 696 Judgment. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 2280. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022) 07/07/2022 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 697 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022) 07/07/2022 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 697 Notice of Appeal were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022) DOJ-OGR-00020578",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page92 of 92",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "November 22, 2021 Memorandum Opinion & Order re Expert Witness Gershman; - November 22, 2021 Memorandum Opinion & Order re Expert Witness Hall; - November 30, 2021 Scheduling Order re Pseudonym Conferral; - December 15, 2021 Order re Response Schedule. The Court is now docketing those items. In order to ensure a complete docket, the parties are ORDERED to confer and determine whether any letters or briefing submitted to the Court without a redaction or sealing request remain to be docketed. The Court has determined, for example, that the parties failed to file on the docket their December 15 letter briefing and December 16 joint letter regarding witness prior inconsistent statements. Any outstanding items, including any proposed redactions, must be filed on ECF by July 12, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/29/2022, United States Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "06/29/2022 695 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 06/29/2022)",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "06/29/2022 696 JUDGMENT In A Criminal Case (S2 20-Cr-330). Date of Imposition of Judgment: 6/29/2022. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (1) was found guilty on Count(s) 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss (judgment not entered on 1 & 5 as multipicitous, Dkt. No. 657). plea of not guilty. The defendant has been found not guilty on Count(s) 2ss. Count(s) 7ss-8ss, and underlying indictments are dismissed on the motion of the United States. IMPRISONMENT: The Defendant is sentenced to a term of 60 Months. Count 4 a sentence of 240 Months. Count 3 a sentence of 240 Months. Count 6 a sentence of 240 Months. All Counts to run concurrently. - Defendant was notified of her right to Appeal. - The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: Defendant to be considered for designation to FCI Danbury. Defendant to be considered for enrollment in FIT program. SUPERVISED RELEASE: 3 Years on Counts 3 and 4. 5 Years on Count 6 to run concurrently. Standard Conditions of Supervision (See page 5 of Judgment). Special Conditions of Supervision (See page 6 of Judgment). ASSESSMENT: $300.00, due immediately. FINE: $750,000.00. Schedule of Payments (See page 8 of Judgment). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/29/2022)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "06/29/2022 DISMISSAL OF COUNTS on Government Motion as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) Count 1s,1s,2s,3s,3s,4s,4s,5s-6s,5-6,7ss-8ss. (bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "07/07/2022 697 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Ghislaine Maxwell from 696 Judgment. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 2280. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022)",
  40. "position": "middle"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "07/07/2022 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell to US Court of Appeals re: 697 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022)",
  45. "position": "middle"
  46. },
  47. {
  48. "type": "printed",
  49. "content": "07/07/2022 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 697 Notice of Appeal were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 07/07/2022)",
  50. "position": "middle"
  51. },
  52. {
  53. "type": "printed",
  54. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020578",
  55. "position": "footer"
  56. }
  57. ],
  58. "entities": {
  59. "people": [
  60. "Ghislaine Maxwell",
  61. "Alison J. Nathan"
  62. ],
  63. "organizations": [
  64. "United States Circuit Judge",
  65. "Bureau of Prisons",
  66. "FCI Danbury",
  67. "US Court of Appeals",
  68. "U.S. Court of Appeals"
  69. ],
  70. "locations": [],
  71. "dates": [
  72. "November 22, 2021",
  73. "December 15, 2021",
  74. "December 16, 2021",
  75. "July 12, 2022",
  76. "06/29/2022",
  77. "07/07/2022"
  78. ],
  79. "reference_numbers": [
  80. "Case 22-1426",
  81. "Document 3-2",
  82. "3344434",
  83. "695",
  84. "696",
  85. "697",
  86. "S2 20-Cr-330",
  87. "Dkt. No. 657",
  88. "2280",
  89. "DOJ-OGR-00020578"
  90. ]
  91. },
  92. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet with various entries related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is well-formatted and legible, with clear headings and concise descriptions of each entry."
  93. }