mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020637.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "19",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page19 of 208\nA-15\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\n\n| 10/20/2020 | 65 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated October 20, 2020 re: Reply Letter in Further Support of Request to Delay Disclosure Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 10/20/2020)\n| 10/23/2020 | 66 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated October 23, 2020 re: Response to the Governments October 7, 2020 letter (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/23/2020)\n| 10/30/2020 | 67 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated October 30, 2020 re: Reply to Defense's October 23, 2020 Letter Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 10/30/2020)\n| 11/05/2020 | 68 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/5/2020 ) (See ORDER set forth) (ap) (Entered: 11/05/2020)\n| 11/06/2020 | 69 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/06/2020 | 70 | AFFIDAVIT of Maurene Comey by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/06/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 71 | MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 55 Notice of Appeal. USCA Case Number 20-3061-cr. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion to consolidate is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued as Mandate: 11/09/2020. (nd) (Entered: 11/09/2020)\n| 11/09/2020 | 72 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 69 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz dated November 6, 2020 re: Request to Extend Discovery Deadline for Portion of Electronic Discovery. ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby extends the deadline for the Government's production of electronic discovery from November 9, 2020 to November 23, 2020. The Court also grants the parties' request for an extension of the motions deadlines as follows: the Defendant's motions are due by January 11, 2021, the Government's responses are due by February 12, 2021, and any replies are due by February 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Discovery due by 11/23/2020. Motions due by 1/11/2021. Responses due by 2/12/2021. Replies due by 2/19/2021.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/9/2020) (lnl) (Entered: 11/10/2020)\n| 11/18/2020 | 73 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 60 Letter filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: The Government respectfully requests that the Court approve the Government's request to delay disclosure of these Materials...ENDORSEMENT...There is no dispute that the materials referenced in the Government's letter will be turned over to the defense. The Government has indicated that it will do so. The only dispute, then, relates to the timing of such disclosure. See Dkt. Nos. 64, 65. Because the Government has articulated plausible reasons for some delay of disclosure, see Dkt. No. 65 at 4, the Court grants the Government's request to delay disclosure. However, the Governments proposal to delay disclosure until 8 weeks in advance of trial is insufficient. In order to https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 15/113 DOJ-OGR-00020637",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page19 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-15",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Table of court documents",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 15/113 DOJ-OGR-00020637",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Jeffrey S. Pagliuca",
      "Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA",
      "USCA",
      "SDNY"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/20/2020",
      "10/23/2020",
      "10/30/2020",
      "11/05/2020",
      "11/06/2020",
      "11/09/2020",
      "11/18/2020",
      "02/28/2023",
      "October 7, 2020",
      "October 21, 2020",
      "January 11, 2021",
      "February 12, 2021",
      "February 19, 2021",
      "November 23, 2020"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57",
      "3475900",
      "65",
      "66",
      "67",
      "68",
      "69",
      "70",
      "71",
      "72",
      "73",
      "55",
      "60",
      "64",
      "20-3061-cr"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a table listing various court documents related to the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The table includes the date, docket number, and a brief description of each document. The document is printed and does not contain any handwritten text or stamps."
}