mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020720.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "102",
    "document_number": "57",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page102 of 208\nA-98\n2/22/23, 1:25 PM\nSDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6\nJune 22, 2022 - Government sentencing submission due; June 28, 2022 - Sentencing. This resolves Dkt. No. 655. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/26/2022) (bw) (Entered: 04/26/2022)\n04/29/2022 | 657 | OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell....[*** See this Opinion & Order ***]...V. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the Defendant's Rule 29 motion because the jury's guilty verdicts were supported by the witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at trial. The Court denies the Defendant's motion based on constructive amendment or variance because the Government's evidence at trial, and summation all captured the core of criminality charged in the Indictment, and the Defendant was not prejudiced by any alleged variance. Further, because the Government neither intentionally delayed its prosecution nor was the Defendant prejudiced by any delay, the Court also denies the Defendant's motion based on pre-indictment delay. Finally, the Court grants the Defendant's motion as to multiplicity. The Government concedes that Count One is multiplicitous with Count Three, and the Court further concludes that Count Five is multiplicitous with Count Three. Count Five, like Counts One and Three, charged the Defendant's participation in the same decade-long unlawful agreement with the Defendant's continuous coconspirator, Jeffrey Epstein, to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. Accordingly, the Court will enter judgment of conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six. The Defendant's sentencing date remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. The Court previously set a schedule for sentencing submissions that remains in effect. Dkt. No. 656. This resolves Dkt. No. 599. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/29/2022)(bw) (Entered: 04/29/2022)\n05/10/2022 | 658 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 05/10/2022 re: 2-day extension to file sentencing submission . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 05/10/2022)\n05/11/2022 | 659 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT 658 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 05/10/2022 re: 2-day extension to file sentencing submission...ENDORSEMENT..The request is DENIED. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/11/2022) (jw) (Entered: 05/11/2022)\n05/11/2022 | 660 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 11, 2022 re: Speedy Trial Exclusion . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 05/11/2022)\n05/11/2022 | 661 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 660 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 11, 2022 re: Speedy Trial Exclusion. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Alison J. Nathan, U.S. Circuit Judge Sitting by designation on 5/11/2022) (ap) (Entered: 05/11/2022)\n06/15/2022 | 662 | MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 06/15/2022)\n06/15/2022 | 663 | SENTENCING SUBMISSION by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 06/15/2022)\n06/17/2022 | 664 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As noted in this Court's prior order, sentencing in this matter is scheduled for June 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 577. The sentencing proceeding will take place in Courtroom 318 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. Substantial seating for members of the press and public will be available in Courtroom 318. Overflow courtrooms will be https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 98/113 DOJ-OGR-00020720",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 57 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page102 of 208",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-98",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2/22/23, 1:25 PM",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "June 22, 2022 - Government sentencing submission due; June 28, 2022 - Sentencing. This resolves Dkt. No. 655. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/26/2022) (bw) (Entered: 04/26/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "04/29/2022 | 657 | OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell....[*** See this Opinion & Order ***]...V. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the Defendant's Rule 29 motion because the jury's guilty verdicts were supported by the witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at trial. The Court denies the Defendant's motion based on constructive amendment or variance because the Government's evidence at trial, and summation all captured the core of criminality charged in the Indictment, and the Defendant was not prejudiced by any alleged variance. Further, because the Government neither intentionally delayed its prosecution nor was the Defendant prejudiced by any delay, the Court also denies the Defendant's motion based on pre-indictment delay. Finally, the Court grants the Defendant's motion as to multiplicity. The Government concedes that Count One is multiplicitous with Count Three, and the Court further concludes that Count Five is multiplicitous with Count Three. Count Five, like Counts One and Three, charged the Defendant's participation in the same decade-long unlawful agreement with the Defendant's continuous coconspirator, Jeffrey Epstein, to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. Accordingly, the Court will enter judgment of conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six. The Defendant's sentencing date remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. The Court previously set a schedule for sentencing submissions that remains in effect. Dkt. No. 656. This resolves Dkt. No. 599. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/29/2022)(bw) (Entered: 04/29/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "05/10/2022 | 658 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 05/10/2022 re: 2-day extension to file sentencing submission . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 05/10/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "05/11/2022 | 659 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT 658 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 05/10/2022 re: 2-day extension to file sentencing submission...ENDORSEMENT..The request is DENIED. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/11/2022) (jw) (Entered: 05/11/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "05/11/2022 | 660 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 11, 2022 re: Speedy Trial Exclusion . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 05/11/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "05/11/2022 | 661 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1) on 660 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated May 11, 2022 re: Speedy Trial Exclusion. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Alison J. Nathan, U.S. Circuit Judge Sitting by designation on 5/11/2022) (ap) (Entered: 05/11/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/15/2022 | 662 | MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Objections to the Presentence Investigation Report. (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 06/15/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/15/2022 | 663 | SENTENCING SUBMISSION by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 06/15/2022)",
      "position": "body"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "06/17/2022 | 664 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As noted in this Court's prior order, sentencing in this matter is scheduled for June 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 577. The sentencing proceeding will take place in Courtroom 318 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. Substantial seating for members of the press and public will be available in Courtroom 318. Overflow courtrooms will be https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 98/113 DOJ-OGR-00020720",
      "position": "body"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Bobbi C Sternheim",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "Maurene Comey",
      "Alison Moe",
      "Lara Pomerantz",
      "Andrew Rohrbach",
      "Christian Everdell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "USA"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "04/29/2022",
      "05/10/2022",
      "05/11/2022",
      "06/15/2022",
      "06/17/2022",
      "06/22/2022",
      "06/28/2022",
      "04/26/2022",
      "02/28/2023",
      "2/22/23"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Dkt. No. 655",
      "Dkt. No. 656",
      "Dkt. No. 599",
      "Dkt. No. 577",
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 57"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court docket sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is a record of the proceedings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes a list of filings and orders related to the case, including opinions, motions, and sentencing submissions. The document is dated February 28, 2023, and is page 102 of 208."
}