mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020833.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "7",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page7 of 221\nA-207\nLCRVMAXT 3126\n1 mind of their own. Because last week the Court invited them to\n2 sit the extra day and they declined that. So an inquiry may be\n3 appropriate, but I don't think telling them what they should do\n4 is necessarily the right thing to do.\n5 THE COURT: Well, I have told them previously that\n6 they are here till at least 5. I think the question is\n7 whether, in light of the circumstances we find ourselves, we\n8 should encourage longer, if it's available to them. But you\n9 think about it. I'll hear from you. I'm not intending to do\n10 anything just yet. I presume we will hear from them as to this\n11 evening, but think about the indication of at least some\n12 extension of hours tomorrow if they have not completed the\n13 task.\n14 All right? Thank you.\n15 (Recess pending verdict)\n16 THE COURT: I have a note.\n17 Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the\n18 transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to\n19 New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in\n20 sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second\n21 element?\n22 I'm going to let you take a -- if you want to just\n23 take a look at the note. Counsel, you're welcome to take a\n24 photo of it, if that helps.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00020833",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page7 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-207",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCRVMAXT 3126",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 mind of their own. Because last week the Court invited them to\n2 sit the extra day and they declined that. So an inquiry may be\n3 appropriate, but I don't think telling them what they should do\n4 is necessarily the right thing to do.\n5 THE COURT: Well, I have told them previously that\n6 they are here till at least 5. I think the question is\n7 whether, in light of the circumstances we find ourselves, we\n8 should encourage longer, if it's available to them. But you\n9 think about it. I'll hear from you. I'm not intending to do\n10 anything just yet. I presume we will hear from them as to this\n11 evening, but think about the indication of at least some\n12 extension of hours tomorrow if they have not completed the\n13 task.\n14 All right? Thank you.\n15 (Recess pending verdict)\n16 THE COURT: I have a note.\n17 Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the\n18 transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to\n19 New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in\n20 sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second\n21 element?\n22 I'm going to let you take a -- if you want to just\n23 take a look at the note. Counsel, you're welcome to take a\n24 photo of it, if that helps.\n25 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020833",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Jane"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020833"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}