mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020863.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "37",
    "document_number": "22-1426",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page37 of 221\nA-237\n3154\nLCSCMAXT\n1    activity that occurred in New Mexico, that wouldn't be a\n2    sufficient basis to convict on Count Four or Count Two because\n3    it requires an intent to violate New York law, and you can't\n4    violate this section of New York law in New Mexico.\n5    \n6    So if that's all they're considered on a basis to\n7    convict on Count Four and Count Two, then that would be\n8    insufficient and improper, and that's why I think a\n9    supplemental instruction that clarifies that point is warranted\n10   in this case, but I understand the Court has rejected that.\n11   And that's all.\n12   THE COURT: I think the instruction is correct that I\n13   referred them to. The reading of the note that you've\n14   suggested, I have no idea if that's what the jury is asking or\n15   many other plausible readings, and what you've proposed, as you\n16   just indicated, would be incorrect. So, I think that's why\n17   precisely we sent them back to the charge.\n18   Anything else?\n19   MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor.\n20   THE COURT: As I said, we'll see where we are at the\n21   end of the day, but in light of the variant, my concern about\n22   interruption of trial, given the increasing daily risk of\n23   exposure to either a juror or trial participant requiring\n24   quarantine, it is time to think to have the jurors make plans\n25   to continue deliberating until a verdict is reached.\n26   I will wait until we hear from the jury, otherwise\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020863",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page37 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-237",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3154\nLCSCMAXT\n1    activity that occurred in New Mexico, that wouldn't be a\n2    sufficient basis to convict on Count Four or Count Two because\n3    it requires an intent to violate New York law, and you can't\n4    violate this section of New York law in New Mexico.\n5    \n6    So if that's all they're considered on a basis to\n7    convict on Count Four and Count Two, then that would be\n8    insufficient and improper, and that's why I think a\n9    supplemental instruction that clarifies that point is warranted\n10   in this case, but I understand the Court has rejected that.\n11   And that's all.\n12   THE COURT: I think the instruction is correct that I\n13   referred them to. The reading of the note that you've\n14   suggested, I have no idea if that's what the jury is asking or\n15   many other plausible readings, and what you've proposed, as you\n16   just indicated, would be incorrect. So, I think that's why\n17   precisely we sent them back to the charge.\n18   Anything else?\n19   MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor.\n20   THE COURT: As I said, we'll see where we are at the\n21   end of the day, but in light of the variant, my concern about\n22   interruption of trial, given the increasing daily risk of\n23   exposure to either a juror or trial participant requiring\n24   quarantine, it is time to think to have the jurors make plans\n25   to continue deliberating until a verdict is reached.\n26   I will wait until we hear from the jury, otherwise",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020863",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. EVERDELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New Mexico",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "3475901",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020863"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}