mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020896.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "70",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page70 of 221\nA-270\n14\nM38PMAX1\nQ. Did you hope that you would be\nA. I did not hope to be on this 'jury. But again, like if\nyou're going to serve jury duty, it might as well as be\nsomething that's interesting, but I did not set out in order to\nget on this jury.\nQ. Let me ask you to return to question 18A, page 24. You\nspoke to this a little bit but I want to make sure I understand\nthe answer.\nQ. You indicated that when you checked no, that was\nan inaccurate answer.\nA. I didn't see the part where it says, 'I was distracted by all the\nnoise going on around me.' I was just like 'no.' I said,\ncompletely skimmed way too fast. And again, I just\nwanted to get done with it.\nQ. Had you been sitting for hours, there were\nthree\naudiovisual problems\nI literally sat there for three\nhours, getting your video to play, so we\nI didn't have a phone, I didn't have a book, I was\nsitting there twiddling my thumbs thinking about the break up\nthat just happened a few weeks prior and I was sitting in my\nfeelings\nand not very focused.\nQ. So tell me what you understand to be asking for\ninformation to be asking about family or a friend.\nA. I thought it was asking for self? And the box that says yes for\nself? I just missed it. Right, I just missed it.\nQ. This was\none of the biggest mistakes I have ever made in my life, and if\nI could go back and change everything and have slowed down and\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n\n13\nM38PMAX1\nno because you didn't consider them family.\nA. Family, yeah.\nQ. But now you say yes because it would have been\na stepbrother.\nA. Because by marriage, that person was my\nstepbrother. Explain.\nQ. So when you road the question that way and it\nsays has a friend or family member ever been accused,\nthen the\ncorrect answer would have been yes, a friend or family member.\nQ. Okay. And so the response then for 48A is what you\nwould have given for 48B?\nA. Yes, your Honor.\nQ. And 49B, do you believe this\nwould affect your ability to serve fairly and impartially as a\njuror in this case?\nA. In no case.\nQ. It would not affect me.\nIn responding a moment ago you said you never thought you\nwould be chosen as a juror. Why is that?\nA. Only because the sheer volume of people that were there,\nin this case, I just never\nthought - number of people.\nSo I just never\nthought it was going to be me when they played the video of you, I just\nthought that the likelihood of being chosen, surely they will\nbe interviewing thousands of people. And they ultimately\nchoose twelve people to sit on a jury, and I never thought I\nwould be one of those twelve.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nDOJ-OGR-00020896",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page70 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-270",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "14\nM38PMAX1\nQ. Did you hope that you would be\nA. I did not hope to be on this 'jury. But again, like if\nyou're going to serve jury duty, it might as well as be\nsomething that's interesting, but I did not set out in order to\nget on this jury.\nQ. Let me ask you to return to question 18A, page 24. You\nspoke to this a little bit but I want to make sure I understand\nthe answer.\nQ. You indicated that when you checked no, that was\nan inaccurate answer.\nA. I didn't see the part where it says, 'I was distracted by all the\nnoise going on around me.' I was just like 'no.' I said,\ncompletely skimmed way too fast. And again, I just\nwanted to get done with it.\nQ. Had you been sitting for hours, there were\nthree\naudiovisual problems\nI literally sat there for three\nhours, getting your video to play, so we\nI didn't have a phone, I didn't have a book, I was\nsitting there twiddling my thumbs thinking about the break up\nthat just happened a few weeks prior and I was sitting in my\nfeelings\nand not very focused.\nQ. So tell me what you understand to be asking for\ninformation to be asking about family or a friend.\nA. I thought it was asking for self? And the box that says yes for\nself? I just missed it. Right, I just missed it.\nQ. This was\none of the biggest mistakes I have ever made in my life, and if\nI could go back and change everything and have slowed down and",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "13\nM38PMAX1\nno because you didn't consider them family.\nA. Family, yeah.\nQ. But now you say yes because it would have been\na stepbrother.\nA. Because by marriage, that person was my\nstepbrother. Explain.\nQ. So when you road the question that way and it\nsays has a friend or family member ever been accused,\nthen the\ncorrect answer would have been yes, a friend or family member.\nQ. Okay. And so the response then for 48A is what you\nwould have given for 48B?\nA. Yes, your Honor.\nQ. And 49B, do you believe this\nwould affect your ability to serve fairly and impartially as a\njuror in this case?\nA. In no case.\nQ. It would not affect me.\nIn responding a moment ago you said you never thought you\nwould be chosen as a juror. Why is that?\nA. Only because the sheer volume of people that were there,\nin this case, I just never\nthought - number of people.\nSo I just never\nthought it was going to be me when they played the video of you, I just\nthought that the likelihood of being chosen, surely they will\nbe interviewing thousands of people. And they ultimately\nchoose twelve people to sit on a jury, and I never thought I\nwould be one of those twelve.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020896",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Southern District"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "58",
      "3475901",
      "70",
      "221",
      "A-270",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020896"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure of questions and answers. The text is mostly printed, with some stamps and a footer containing a reference number. The content suggests a legal proceeding, likely a jury selection process."
}