mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00020905.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "79",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page79 of 221\nA-279\n32\nM3BTMAX1\nThanks for telling my story. So if he says: I didn't expect the world to hear about my sexual abuse, yet at the same time he's telling Annie Farmer, \"that suggests to me one of the victims, post-trial, 'that he was known as the victim of sexual abuse, he wanted to be seen as a champion of sexual abuse, and that this explanation that he is giving is simply false.'\" There's also the Facebook post that he made after the fact.\nTHE COURT: Just a moment. I will ask him to explain, to reconcile if he can, that he didn't he think people would know about it on social media and thanked one of the witnesses in the case.\nMR. EVEREDELL: Your Honor, he said this is a verdict, which I think includes himself. How does he reconcile that he didn't comment with the fact that he was a victim of sexual abuse, meaning: I'm doing this for all of the victims, which I think is clear. That's a conflict.\nGhislaine Maxwell trial. What an incredible, surreal experience. Again, telling the world that I'm out here.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n31\nM3BTMAX1\nTHE COURT: Make your arguments in briefing afterwards, if you're doing that. I want specific proposed questions in light of responses.\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know your Honor did not want to get into what happened in the jury room, but a couple of - I'm root permitted to get into that.\nTHE COURT: You are permitted to discuss what he stated publicly and clearly he said that he - \nMS. STERNHEIM: have written an analysis of that issue in my opinion. That the 'jury deliberations does not allow me to accept, as part of this, evidence of what happened in jury deliberations.' You may disagree with that legal analysis.\nI have written extensively about it in my February 24 opinion. I won't reiterate that now.\nMS. STERNHEIM: He did not tell very many people about it, then he told the world.\nTHE COURT: Right. I pressed repeatedly on that issue. If you have a specific follow up that you would like me to ask - \nMR. EVEREDELL: He said he didn't tell many people, but he also said he didn't think people would learn about his history of sexual abuse, despite the fact that he was telling reporters about that. He need to ask him, I think, about his post to Annie Farmer where he says:\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\nDOJ-OGR-00020905",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page79 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-279",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "32\nM3BTMAX1\nThanks for telling my story. So if he says: I didn't expect the world to hear about my sexual abuse, yet at the same time he's telling Annie Farmer, \"that suggests to me one of the victims, post-trial, 'that he was known as the victim of sexual abuse, he wanted to be seen as a champion of sexual abuse, and that this explanation that he is giving is simply false.'\" There's also the Facebook post that he made after the fact.\nTHE COURT: Just a moment. I will ask him to explain, to reconcile if he can, that he didn't he think people would know about it on social media and thanked one of the witnesses in the case.\nMR. EVEREDELL: Your Honor, he said this is a verdict, which I think includes himself. How does he reconcile that he didn't comment with the fact that he was a victim of sexual abuse, meaning: I'm doing this for all of the victims, which I think is clear. That's a conflict.\nGhislaine Maxwell trial. What an incredible, surreal experience. Again, telling the world that I'm out here.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "31\nM3BTMAX1\nTHE COURT: Make your arguments in briefing afterwards, if you're doing that. I want specific proposed questions in light of responses.\nMS. STERNHEIM: I know your Honor did not want to get into what happened in the jury room, but a couple of - I'm root permitted to get into that.\nTHE COURT: You are permitted to discuss what he stated publicly and clearly he said that he - \nMS. STERNHEIM: have written an analysis of that issue in my opinion. That the 'jury deliberations does not allow me to accept, as part of this, evidence of what happened in jury deliberations.' You may disagree with that legal analysis.\nI have written extensively about it in my February 24 opinion. I won't reiterate that now.\nMS. STERNHEIM: He did not tell very many people about it, then he told the world.\nTHE COURT: Right. I pressed repeatedly on that issue. If you have a specific follow up that you would like me to ask - \nMR. EVEREDELL: He said he didn't tell many people, but he also said he didn't think people would learn about his history of sexual abuse, despite the fact that he was telling reporters about that. He need to ask him, I think, about his post to Annie Farmer where he says:\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00020905",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Annie Farmer",
      "Ghislaine Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/28/2023",
      "February 24"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 58",
      "3475901",
      "Page79 of 221",
      "A-279",
      "DOJ-OGR-00020905"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some formatting issues and potential redactions. The text is mostly clear, but there may be some minor errors in transcription due to the quality of the original document."
}