mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021039.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "213",
    "document_number": "58",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page213 of 221\nA-413\n38\nM6SQmax1\n1 me is specific and highly technical. Does the preponderance of\n2 the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic\n3 Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18\n4 in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the\n5 evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy\n6 to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or\n7 December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact\n8 earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no\n9 evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary\n10 evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a\n11 preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during\n12 those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.\n13 In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the\n14 government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last\n15 time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in\n16 2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than\n17 four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son\n18 in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message\n19 pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several\n20 times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May\n21 again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to\n22 Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger\n23 friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18\n24 years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and\n25 her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00021039",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 58, 02/28/2023, 3475901, Page213 of 221",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "A-413",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "38\nM6SQmax1\n1 me is specific and highly technical. Does the preponderance of\n2 the evidence demonstrate that the offense to sex traffic\n3 Carolyn continued after November 1, 2004 before she turned 18\n4 in early 2005? In other words, does a preponderance of the\n5 evidence establish that acts in furtherance of the conspiracy\n6 to traffic Carolyn occurred in either November or\n7 December 2004? Although Carolyn testified regarding contact\n8 earlier in 2004 and after she turned 18 in 2005, there is no\n9 evidence, either in the form of testimony or documentary\n10 evidence, including the message pads, that demonstrates by a\n11 preponderance of the evidence conspiratorial conduct during\n12 those last two months of 2004 before Carolyn turned 18 in 2005.\n13 In those portions of Carolyn's testimony cited by the\n14 government, Carolyn stated that she was 18 years old the last\n15 time she went to Epstein's house, which would have been in\n16 2005. As Carolyn further explained, she returned more than\n17 four or five times to Epstein after she gave birth to her son\n18 in March of 2004, and that testimony is supported by message\n19 pads entered at trial that show Carolyn called Epstein several\n20 times in the summer of 2004: Once in late April or early May\n21 again on July 6, and again on July 30. When she did return to\n22 Epstein, Carolyn testified Epstein asked if she had younger\n23 friends, and she explained during her testimony that at 18\n24 years old, she was too old for him. Carolyn wasn't asked, and\n25 her testimony doesn't specifically address, whether she went to",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021039",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Carolyn",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "November 1, 2004",
      "2005",
      "March 2004",
      "April 2004",
      "May 2004",
      "July 6, 2004",
      "July 30, 2004",
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "22-1426",
      "58",
      "3475901",
      "213",
      "221",
      "A-413",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021039",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and a victim named Carolyn. The text discusses Carolyn's testimony and interactions with Epstein. The document is from the Southern District Reporters, P.C. and contains a reference number DOJ-OGR-00021039."
}