mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES008/DOJ-OGR-00021067.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "20",
    "document_number": "59",
    "date": "02/28/2023",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page20 of 113\ncourt conducted a hearing on March 8, 2022 (A264), after which it denied defendant's motion. A318.\nOn June 28, 2022, the court dismissed Counts One and Five on multiplicity grounds; dismissed the severed perjury counts at the request of the Government; and sentenced Defendant on Counts Three, Four, and Six as described above. Defendant is currently serving the sentence imposed by the District Court.\nOn appeal, Defendant argues, as she did below, that (1) the convictions were obtained in violation of a nonprosecution agreement (\"NPA\"); (2) all counts are time-barred; (3) she was deprived of her constitutional right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury when a juror concealed his traumatic experience as a victim of child sexual abuse during voir dire by providing false answers to the jury questionnaire on every question designed to ferret out this information; (4) the court's refusal to correct the jury's misunderstanding of an element of the transportation offense resulted in a constructive amendment of the indictment or a prejudicial variance; and (5) her sentence was predicated upon a miscalculation of the guideline range and the misapplication of an aggravating role adjustment.\n5\nDOJ-OGR-00021067",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page20 of 113",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "court conducted a hearing on March 8, 2022 (A264), after which it denied defendant's motion. A318.\nOn June 28, 2022, the court dismissed Counts One and Five on multiplicity grounds; dismissed the severed perjury counts at the request of the Government; and sentenced Defendant on Counts Three, Four, and Six as described above. Defendant is currently serving the sentence imposed by the District Court.\nOn appeal, Defendant argues, as she did below, that (1) the convictions were obtained in violation of a nonprosecution agreement (\"NPA\"); (2) all counts are time-barred; (3) she was deprived of her constitutional right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury when a juror concealed his traumatic experience as a victim of child sexual abuse during voir dire by providing false answers to the jury questionnaire on every question designed to ferret out this information; (4) the court's refusal to correct the jury's misunderstanding of an element of the transportation offense resulted in a constructive amendment of the indictment or a prejudicial variance; and (5) her sentence was predicated upon a miscalculation of the guideline range and the misapplication of an aggravating role adjustment.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "5",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00021067",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [],
    "organizations": [
      "Government",
      "District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "March 8, 2022",
      "June 28, 2022",
      "02/28/2023"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "Case 22-1426",
      "Document 59",
      "3475902",
      "A264",
      "A318",
      "DOJ-OGR-00021067"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a specific case. The text is well-formatted and printed. There are no visible stamps or handwritten annotations."
}